On Dec 29 2016 8:14 AM, Jim Craig wrote: > replies are Inline below. > > On 12/29/2016 8:52 AM, EBo wrote: >> I will also inline as below... >> >> On Dec 29 2016 6:42 AM, Jim Craig wrote: >>> See my replies below inline. >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 7:59 PM, Chris Morley wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>> When I entered a value the cursor moves down to the next tool >>>> rather >>>> then the next axis of the same tool. >>>> >>>> I would think this is not what you wanted? >>> This is what I wanted. It is the way most spreadsheets work. If the >>> group does not like enter moving down then we can remove that >>> functionality or put it in as optional. Then the programmer using >>> the >>> widget would have to decide to use it or handle the option in their >>> main application. >> Would it be reasonable to set up a key/functionality map? I am not >> sure it would be worth it, but I can see places where we might want >> to >> map a different key to a function or possibly map a macro. > > I am not sure about this. I am sure it is possible but would it be > worth it?
Agreed. There may be some other code around to template this. Unfortunately I am away from home on an emergency and do not have ready access to my LinuxCNC systems. >>>> If I hold down cursor up (or down) to get to the first or last >>>> tool, >>>> it pauses at that tool, just as I would expect. >>>> >>>> But when I release the button it then moves again which is >>>> slightly >>>> annoying. >>> Well the function actually handles the key release event due to >>> issues >>> with using the key press event occurring before a value is >>> accepted. >>> I >>> am not sure why it is pausing at the first or last tool. I will >>> check >>> on >>> that. Good test! I did not do the hold key test in my testing. >> Is there any way to either set up an automated test suite or >> possibly >> just a list of these tests? As a note, I *know* that automated GUI >> testing is difficult (pre-Y2K I worked for a company that did >> exactly >> this). There are some open source testers that might work >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_GUI_testing_tools>, but >> I >> have absolutely no experiences with any of them. > > I will look into this, but as with you I have no experience with > these. Understand. Since this is mostly a GUI interface, if you can then just add a file in with the source some place on a test/expect procedure then we can replicate by hand if/when needed. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
