Hallo Jim,

first I would say thanks for your work, I am compiling at the moment to 
test from my side.
I checked the code and I would like to recommend:

Is it possible to get the code of:

onTreeNavigateKeyPress

in a own module? This way we would be able to use the same code also for 
the offsetwidget and may be future widgets using a treeview.

I will report as soon as my testing ends.

Norbert

Am 29.12.2016 um 16:14 schrieb Jim Craig:
> replies are Inline below.
>
> On 12/29/2016 8:52 AM, EBo wrote:
>> I will also inline as below...
>>
>> On Dec 29 2016 6:42 AM, Jim Craig wrote:
>>> See my replies below inline.
>>>
>>> On 12/28/2016 7:59 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> When I entered a value the cursor moves down to the next tool rather
>>>> then the next axis of the same tool.
>>>>
>>>> I would think this is not what you wanted?
>>> This is what I wanted. It is the way most spreadsheets work. If the
>>> group does not like enter moving down then we can remove that
>>> functionality or put it in as optional. Then the programmer using the
>>> widget would have to decide to use it or handle the option in their
>>> main
>>> application.
>> Would it be reasonable to set up a key/functionality map?  I am not
>> sure it would be worth it, but I can see places where we might want to
>> map a different key to a function or possibly map a macro.
> I am not sure about this. I am sure it is possible but would it be worth it?
>>>> If I hold down cursor up (or down) to get to the first or last tool,
>>>> it pauses at that tool, just as I would expect.
>>>>
>>>> But when I release the button it then moves again which is slightly
>>>> annoying.
>>> Well the function actually handles the key release event due to
>>> issues
>>> with using the key press event occurring before a value is accepted.
>>> I
>>> am not sure why it is pausing at the first or last tool. I will check
>>> on
>>> that. Good test! I did not do the hold key test in my testing.
>> Is there any way to either set up an automated test suite or possibly
>> just a list of these tests?  As a note, I *know* that automated GUI
>> testing is difficult (pre-Y2K I worked for a company that did exactly
>> this).  There are some open source testers that might work
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_GUI_testing_tools>, but I
>> have absolutely no experiences with any of them.
> I will look into this, but as with you I have no experience with these.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to