Jogging while paused is a separate problem from removing modes. The controller 
is busy when paused, So not available to do anything else.
I agree Michael's idea to the jog while paused problem was very interesting and 
probably opened up other interesting uses, unfortunately I'm sure it's dead 
code now.

Chris M

----- Reply message -----
From: "Rene Hopf" <reneh...@mac.com>
To: "EMC developers" <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Emc-developers] Mode switching bug
Date: Tue, Dec 5, 2017 6:30 AM



> On 5. Dec 2017, at 10:33, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I actually wonder why the controller must have modes at all.
>
> The only thing really important is if it is busy it must finish.

removing modes altogether would solve a lot of problems.
especially jogging while paused, which is a much requested feature, and comes 
up very often.
there is a jog while paused branch, which already does most of the stuff, like 
going back to the old position when you continue.


>
> ie if it's busy running an MDI command it can't jog
>
> If it's running a program it can't MDI
>
> etc
>
> Traditionally NC machines separated these modes with a switch.
>
> I don't see why we need to do that any more.
>
>
> If the controller is idle it should be able to do anything.
>
> This would leave it to the UI/user to decide whats allowed when.
>
>
> UIs have been working around this problem for  a very long time.
>
> Ie touchoff is an MDI command which is quite obviously a manual
>
> mode command.
>
>
> Chris M
>
> ________________________________
> From: Kurt Jacobson <kurtcjacob...@gmail.com>
> Sent: December 4, 2017 7:27 PM
> To: EMC developers
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Mode switching bug
>
> Any UI that wants to work well with wheel jogging has to find some way of
> setting the task_mode
> back to manual after each MDI command, and as we have seen that is not
> trivial to do without
> breaking external programs that issue MDI commands. In fact, I do not think
> it is an overstatement
> to say that so far *nobody* has managed to make both wheel jogging and
> external  MDI commands
> work satisfactorily at the same time.
>
> Since all UIs suffer from this problem, it seem like instead of each UI
> using some kind of work
> around, this problem might should be solved at a lower level.
>
> I have no idea what MDI mode actually does internally, but from a practical
> user perspective, I can't think
> of any time were there is a need for LCNC to remain in MDI mode after
> issuing an MDI.
>
> As far as I can tell most UIs that work well with wheel jogging employ
> something like the following pseudo code:
>
> def issue_mdi(cmd):
>    set_mode(MDI)
>    issue_mdi(cmd)
>    set_mode(MANUAL)
>
> while(True):
>    if not mode_manual and is_idle:
>         set_mode(MANUAL)
>
> So basically the UI ensures that LCNC is not in MDI mode unless it it
> actively issuing an MDI command, which
> essentially is the same thing as not having an MDI mode at all (from the
> users perspective). So what if instead
> of making each UI have to handle switching back to manual mode this is done
> elsewhere. For example `command.mdi()`
> could switch LCNC to mdi mode, issues the command, and then switched back
> to manual.
>
> It seems like something like this would make life simpler for the UIs ...
>
> Cheers,
> Kurt
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Kurt Jacobson <kurtcjacob...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Rene Hopf <reneh...@mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On 4. Dec 2017, at 16:14, Les Newell <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is master as of a couple of months ago. I'd rather not install the
>>> patch because I want it to switch back to manual after MDI.
>>>
>>> the patch should still allow you to do that. thats why I asked you to
>>> test.
>>>
>>
>> I am afraid not. Dewey's branch does not switch back to manual after an
>> MDI, at least in my tests.
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to