This link seems to confirm the Etherlab invocation is GPLv2 so you may be
right!
https://etherlab.org/en/ethercat/index.php

Rod Webster
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au


On 23 January 2018 at 11:06, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:

> On Monday 22 January 2018 15:14:34 Rod Webster wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Its been a long time but many years ago when working with Ghostscript
> > and commercial interfaces to it. The solution was (under their
> > license) to build an interface to the external library in such a way
> > if the external library/DLL wasn't there the software did not fail and
> > if another library with an identical interface to the published
> > interface was installed, the software would operate as normal. If the
> > library was not found, the software did not crash but it was not
> > functional. This required a bit more work on the part of the developer
> > as the DLL required to be loaded at runtime dynamically rather than
> > being linked statically at compile time.
> >
> > If such an approach was allowable under the LinuxCNC license, from the
> > users perspective all that he would need to do would be to install an
> > ethercat binary and ethercat protocol would be enabled as LinuxCNC's
> > code is totally compartmentalised from the commercial license. (kinda
> > like a software version of plugging in a Mesa Smart Serial device.)
> >
> > Rod Webster
> > +61 435 765 611
> > Vehicle Modifications Network
> > www.vehiclemods.net.au
> >
> > On 23 January 2018 at 05:38, Darren Conway <darren.con...@xtra.co.nz>
> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Has anyone considered asking Bekhoff for their view on this issue?
> > >
> > > They might grant a GPL compatible license for LinuxCNC.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Darren Conway
> > >
> > > On 23.01.18 8:27 AM, Andy Pugh wrote:
> > >> On 22 Jan 2018, at 21:08, Nicklas Karlsson
> > >> <nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> In source code I got from soem there is GNU license but somewhere
> > >>> I also found an exception, below so I am a little bit confused.
> > >>
> > >> I have always been confused by this too.
> > >>
> > >> The worry is that if we distribute anything EtherCAT with LinuxCNC
> > >> then we obligate anyone who uses it to also seek a Bekhoff license.
> > >> So that would make our distribution not-GPL
> > >>
> > >> I think that the Free Software Foundation has lawyers, but can’t
> > >> recall if we asked them about this.
> > >>
> > >> Then you get into the murky shadows that allow Wine to exist.
>
> I can't seem to understand the problem. GPLv2 specifically prohibits any
> further restrictions. They have stated its GPLv2, so any further
> restrictions either remove it from GPLv2 coverage, or are illegal to
> apply to a GPLv2 license. I'd ask the question at the FSF.
>
> And how many of the court cases have been dropped once the plaintiff
> actually read the license vs how many times the plaintiff has been
> awarded the win against the GPLv2. That balance historically has been
> almost exclusively in favor of the GPLv2.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to