On 5/2/20 8:06 AM, andy pugh wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 14:33, Juergen Gnoss <jgn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm with the folks that like to have lcnc and gui's separated.
It's a much cleaner way for maintenance.
I think it's a daft idea from a user support point of view.
Take the example of where issues would be reported. Would you expect
users to have to search through github to find the right repository to
raise an issue on the right GUI?
Good point about debugging, Andy.
I object to moving the GUIs out of our repo for a different reason: I
worry that the work of building and distributing packages would not get
done by all the GUI developers, and as a result these out-of-repo GUIs
would be harder for our users to access.
That said, I sure am sympathetic to the extra work of maintaining all
these GUIs in our repo.
Perhaps some kind of packaging-as-a-service scheme could help here, but
it would still require proper dependency tracking and release management
to be done by the GUI devs.
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
