Hi Andy, On Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2020, 10:28:05 CEST andy pugh wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 03:29, Reinhard <reinha...@schwarzrot-design.de> wrote: > > ... and from tool table: tool 21 is in slot 5 and tool 30 is in slot 21. > > Neither tool 21 nor tool 31 are mentioned in gcode file, so a random > > toolchanger can't use these slots for whatever reason. > > I noticed that the status in Touchy was showing T5 prepared when I had > T4 loaded last night.
Don't know, whether I understand you. Do you mean, that current behaviour is a bug? > I wonder if, possibly, the logging info needs to be updated to reflect ... Well, if the interpreter can return both, toolnum and slotnum, it would be nice to add a prefix, so that a reader knows, whether toolnum or slotnum has been told. I believe, that the interpreter should never return a slot number, but may be others think different. Beside that: it would be nice, if the interpreter could mention the source line number without having me to add a N-word. Without the N-word there exists no relation between source and interpreter output. cheers Reinhard _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
