Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 10:26, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 at 08:35, Håvard F. Aasen via Emc-developers
> <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> You have to bear in mind how the tools are called up from the G-code.
>
> M6 T6
>
> There is only a single integer passed to whatever selects the tool.
>

Anyone who has had the chance to work on a controller that allows to manage
tools by name can't forget that! 😭😅
Which makes me wonder it that could be done with remapping and a bit of
Python 🤔


And if T6 is a 6mm square ended milling cutter (for example) it is
> quite likely that you don't care _which_ 6mm square ended cutter you
> get.
>

That can be in most cases, but i can also manage different variants of same
type and want, at times, to specify the exact type to the op for that funky
part at hand.


> So, the tool _number_ as associated with the G-code T-command is very
> deliberately _not_ a key but a "property."
>

I think that number is really a pocket_id in a tool_magazine to which is
associated a tool_id, which in turn has a tool_number... Properly indeed!


Which makes me think that this tool_number may better be an alphanumerical
tool_code.

TY
J

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to