Another candidate to be included: Currently M5 by default stops spindle 0, but not any others.
I have two PR’s for two different options: 1. Stop all of them https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/2438 2. Allow for enabling a default spindle or -1 for all spindles. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/2437 I’d prefer the second option as more configuration, with safe defaults is nice. I’m not opposed to the first option The current code almost caused mayhem. * This gantry has a 5 axis spindle, and hotwire cutter on side of the gantry on a Y axis * A planer on the back side of the gantry on a separate Y axis * Program runs 1 tool after the other, but didn’t stop the hotwire or planer as they’re mapped to spindle inputs. * On the other hand maybe this is too many tools on one machine Chad Woitas | Automation Developer [cid:image001.png@01D7F7D7.6E1AFA10] RMD Engineering Inc.<http://www.rmd-engineering.com/> | Saskatoon Machine Works Ltd.<http://www.smw.sk.ca/> | Scientific Instrumentation Ltd.<http://www.sil.sk.ca/> From: Rod Webster<mailto:r...@vehiclemods.net.au> Sent: June 7, 2023 1:39 PM To: EMC developers<mailto:emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Bookworm Bookworm will be released in 2 days time on 10 June. I am waiting until then to finalise the Bookworm URL in my getting-linuxcnc docs. https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/2496 Hopefully, one of you guys can push it soon after. Now there is a buildbot building the Bookworm debs, perhaps we could use that doc to instruct the user (including me) how to configure sources.list to give preference to that version over the Debian package. I don't know how to do that but if one of you guys could tell me how to do it, I'll include it. I might be wrong but I thought Stefan indicated Debian might be able to be sweet talked into including 2.9 after the release. Rod Webster 1300 896 832 +61 435 765 611 Vehicle Modifications Network www.vehiclemods.net.au<http://www.vehiclemods.net.au> Rod Webster 1300 896 832 +61 435 765 611 Vehicle Modifications Network www.vehiclemods.net.au<http://www.vehiclemods.net.au> On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 01:27, Sebastian Kuzminsky <s...@highlab.com> wrote: > > On 6/7/23 06:48, andy pugh wrote: > > Is it a problem that we haven't actually released 2.9 and that it is > > due to be in Bookworm, which is due to be released very soon indeed? > > IMO it would have been better if we released 2.9.0 and got it into > Bookworm, just because the version number > (`2.9.0~pre1+git20230208.f1270d6ed7`) looks a bit goofy and > unprofessional. Even just `2.9.0~pre2` would have been preferable. > > Based on my reading of > <https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html>, now that > Bookworm is in "Full Freeze" we should not upload a new upstream > release, so i think we're stuck with the big goofy version. > > Any bugs we want to fix in the debian.org package will need to be fixed > in that version of our source code - i assume we'll fix it in the "real" > 2.9 and cherrypick/backport the fix to a "bookworm" branch in our gbp > repo (<https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc-gbp). > > I think that's ok. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > > -- > Sebastian Kuzminsky > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
