Agree. Consider type checking in general as something good. Some errors
may be discovered before program is run because pieces simply do not fit
together. In the best cases a valid output is also produced for all
possible inputs and runtime errors never happen.
Nicklas Karlsson
Den 2023-10-12 kl. 16:01, skrev Chris Morley:
I assume one drawback/advantage is after the change if a component really
expects an unsigned range the user can easily connect a signed component and it
might take a while to find that bug.
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message --------
From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-10-12 1:57 a.m. (GMT-08:00)
To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] RFC: Reduce number of HAL pin types.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:05, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote:
.
I assume you would use a feature branch to start anyways, so we could see what
problems crop up and assess.
Yes, this is definitely not something to drop straight into master. (or 2.9)
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
