I see no evidence that NIST wanted that document to serve as a standard. They don't generally issue their own standards, but when they do, they let you know. I don't think LCNC should be bound to that document, it was incomplete. I would close the bug report as a misunderstanding of LCNC's goals. Eric Keller Boalsburg, Pennsylvania
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:04 AM andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apart from anything else, I am not sure that it is a standard. > > This is based on bug report #2956. Our current behaviour does not match the > NIST RS274 interpreter "report" from 2000. > > The last actual "RS" standard (ie the RS in RS274) was issued in the 1970s. > There is an ISO standard from 1982, and then the NIST EMC report from 2000. > > My own feeling is that any deliberate deviation from the NIST v3 report is > not a "bug" as such, and that perhaps we should simply close the "bug" as a > "feature". > > Has anyone else looked at this bug report? What do you think? > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/issues/2956 > > -- > atp > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed > for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and lunatics." > — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912 > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
