Would we just delete all that, or make it INI-controlled defaulting to
the old behaviour?
Preliminary testing indicates that this might indeed do what you outlined.
Stacking still works but illegal commands like 'G81 Z-10' will only
trigger a message but not abort execution of running code. However
commands that would trigger a limit violation will still abort the
stacked commands (this seems to be handled in a different case in the code)
case INTERP_ERROR:
retval = -1;
break;
Note though that the above would not satisfy what Chris wants:
If I 'stack' 3 moves and the middle one is faulty, I want the last one not to
run either.
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
