On 3/21/26 12:05 PM, Julian Wingert wrote:
LLMs need to be treated as what they are. A 12 year old with
internet connection and very fast reading/writing skills.
Yeah, and you let your 12 year old run the CNC mill?
because the errors it makes are human.
Can we please stop to anthropomorphize the computer?
I really don't get the issue here. We won't use an LLM as the lead.
But as a tool to ease some work and speed up tasks, why not?
Again, what you do /privately/ is up to you. That is not the issue and
it never was.
Copyright is not an issue with short code samples.
The jury is still out on this one.
For a one-liner or very short snippets you /may/ be right, but I've seen
one-liners that are more complex than many a program and are most
certainly under copyright.
It is not solely what comes out of an LLM we have to consider. What went
into the LLM needs to be considered as well because it influences what
comes out. That is an issue completely unresolved.
--
Greetings Bertho
(disclaimers are disclaimed)
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
