Item Subject: IEC 529
Received: from hpcc01.corp.hp.com by hpcc08.corp.hp.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.4 Openmail) id AA056179049; Mon, 20 May 1996
09:17:30 -0700
Received: from relay.hp.com by hpcc01.corp.hp.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA119349046; Mon, 20 May 1996 09:17:27
-0700
Received: from mail.ieee.org (rab.ieee.org) by relay.hp.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA142589044; Mon, 20 May 1996 09:17:24
-0700
Received: by mail.ieee.org (8.7.3/8.7.3)
id KAA13337 for emc-pstc-list; Mon, 20 May 1996 10:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 20 May 96 09:46:50 -0500
To: [email protected] (Receipt Notification Requested)
Subject: IEC 529
Message-Id: <"Macintosh */PRMD=MOT/ADMD=MOT/C=US/"@MHS>
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]>
X-Listname: emc-pstc
X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society
X-Info: Help requests to [email protected]
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected]
X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]
.......................................................................
Item Subject: IEC 529
Hello San,
My experience with IP code marking of products has only been with OEM
Vacuum Pumps using Electric Motors that were marked with an IP code.
However, IP coding was never a concern for products that met IEC
1010-1 as long as the end product met all enclosure requirements of
1010-1.
Regards,
Ron Wellman
[email protected]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: IEC 529
Author: Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc ([email protected]) at
HP-PaloAlto,shargw3
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 5/20/96 7:46 AM
Is anyone familiar with the standard and is it necessary to mark product
with the IP code?
Regards,
San
