There is nothing in the LVD or EMC Directives that prevent the DOC from
being signed by a non-resident of the EU. I can't find the document at
the moment, but somewhere in my files I have a magazine article quoting
a DG representative as confirming this fact. If no one else presents
confirmation, I will try to find it.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
 ----------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: alternate test sites
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Friday, July 11, 1997 10:55AM


Greetings,

These 2 questions may seem rather naive, but I never really had to
address
them.  Any help by those who have direct experience would be greatly
appreciated.

1. I heard the statement "The EU does not accept emissions data from a
semi-anechoic chamber (SAC)"  Since I deal mostly with ITE, I looked in
EN55022-1987, para. 10.3.3 and see no mention of the use of anything but
an
OATS.  The question is "Does all testing to EN55022 have to be performed
at
an OATS or can I use a SAC which has a "good" normalized site
attenuation
(<+/- 4 dB)?"  It would seem to me that if you are self certifying, you
would want to be confident the equipment passes with enough margin that
it
would pass anywhere. If you felt confident using a current probe and a
scope, then go ahead and self-certify.

2. My second question deals with the famous person who signs test
reports
and is the responsible person (i.e. jail time) should the data be found
to
be bogus.  Again, assume we are self certifying ITE equipment.  I was
told
that the responsible person must be a resident of the EU.  A company in
the
States could not self certify and place the CE mark on equipment with
"only" the head of quality signature, assuming the head of quality lives
in
Anytown USA.  I also heard that less than reputable companies in the
States
find "some European guy" who will sign anything and can vanish if the
need
arises.

Some of this sounds like urban legend to me, but I appreciate any
comments
you may have.

Thanks in advance...

Jim Nadolny
AMP Inc.
jim [email protected]

Reply via email to