Regarding your "cute footnote":
The same could be stated for certain husbands.
I suggest that you show greater consideration to people; it has been
many many years since polygamy was outlawed by Mormons.
Tania Grant, Octel Communications Corporation
A non-Mormon.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: alternate test sites
Author: "Alan Hudson +44 (0)1383-821921" <[email protected]> at
P_Internet_Mail
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 7/14/97 10:12 AM
If I remember correctly, it's the Competent Body - the person who approves
(hopefully!) and signs the Technical Construction File - who must be
resident in the EU.
Mind you, this is probably a moot point, now that the EU/USA have signed a
Mutual Recognition Agreement, I assume the USA can now test/approve their
own gear themselves.
--
Alan
Mormons can have more than one wife. This is called polygamy.
Christians can have only one wife. This is called monotony.
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: alternate test sites
> Date: Friday, July 11, 1997 10:55AM
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> These 2 questions may seem rather naive, but I never really had to
> address
> them. Any help by those who have direct experience would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> 1. I heard the statement "The EU does not accept emissions data from a
> semi-anechoic chamber (SAC)" Since I deal mostly with ITE, I looked in
> EN55022-1987, para. 10.3.3 and see no mention of the use of anything but
> an
> OATS. The question is "Does all testing to EN55022 have to be performed
> at
> an OATS or can I use a SAC which has a "good" normalized site
> attenuation
> (<+/- 4 dB)?" It would seem to me that if you are self certifying, you
> would want to be confident the equipment passes with enough margin that
> it
> would pass anywhere. If you felt confident using a current probe and a
> scope, then go ahead and self-certify.
>
> 2. My second question deals with the famous person who signs test
> reports
> and is the responsible person (i.e. jail time) should the data be found
> to
> be bogus. Again, assume we are self certifying ITE equipment. I was
> told
> that the responsible person must be a resident of the EU. A company in
> the
> States could not self certify and place the CE mark on equipment with
> "only" the head of quality signature, assuming the head of quality lives
> in
> Anytown USA. I also heard that less than reputable companies in the
> States
> find "some European guy" who will sign anything and can vanish if the
> need
> arises.
>
> Some of this sounds like urban legend to me, but I appreciate any
> comments
> you may have.
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Jim Nadolny
> AMP Inc.
> jim [email protected]
