Agreed.
 ----------
From: Bob Brister
To: 'Product Safety Technical Forum'
Subject: IEC 950 5.4.9 Compliance criteria for 5.4...
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, February 05, 1997 11:02AM


Hello,

My interpretation of the criteria listed in 5.4.9 is if, under simulated
fault conditions, a hole forms in the enclosure, that is not necessarily
a failure of the product to remain safe. Would you agree?

The criteria seems to indicate that if there is no:

1. propagation of fire beyond the product.
2. emission of molten metal, and
3. no non-compliance with another section of the standard due to
enclosure            deformation,

the product meets the requirements. This may not be a situation you care
to allow from a product quality or customer satisfaction point of view,
but it is not a failure of the product to comply to the requirements.

Note: The assumption is that the product does comply with 4.4.2 and
4.4.3


Regards,

Bob Brister
Digital Equipment Corp.


Bob Brister

Reply via email to