What the German public perceives as being an approval mark
>---------- >From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]] >Sent: 04 April 1997 07:58 >To: [email protected] >Subject: FW: RE: Ergonomic requirements > >What is the significance of "legal requirement in Germany" at a time that all >EC >countries are required to accept CE marked products? >Are there many manufacturers who still apply TUV or VDE marks?(for products >which only >require self declaration). What would be the motivation to do this? > >thanks in advance for your comments >------------------------------------- >Name: moshe valdman >E-mail: [email protected] >Phone: 052-941200, 03-5496369 >Date: 03/04/97 >Time: 23:03:40 >------------------------------------- >***************************************************************************** >********** >--- On Tue, 1 Apr 1997 09:07:00 -0500 "WOODS, RICHARD" ><[email protected]> wrote: >Compliance of workstations with ZH-1 is still a legal requirement in >Germany. TUV and VDE still require testing to the standard to obtain >their approval mark. > ---------- >From: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: Ergonomic requirements >Date: Tuesday, April 01, 1997 1:36AM > > >Hello everyone, > >does anyone happen to know where I can find information on ergonomics >standards? >(e.g. EN 614 ?) >Which directives/standards require ergonomic issues? >(I recall TUV used to require some "color of product" and "size of >letters" >but these are >probably no longer relevant in the times of self declaration) > >thanks >and a happy april 1st > ------------------------------------- >Name: moshe valdman >E-mail: [email protected] >Phone: 052-941200, 03-5496369 >Date: 31/03/97 >Time: 22:36:42 > ------------------------------------- > > > >-----------------End of Original Message----------------- > >------------------------------------- >Name: moshe valdman >E-mail: [email protected] >Phone: 052-941200, 03-5496369 >Date: 03/04/97 >Time: 22:58:47 >------------------------------------- > >
