Well put, Chris.  On this same topic, I've been curious for many years
now about the suitability of Hall Effect sensors in interlock circuits.
Any comments?

Peter L. Tarver
Nortel
[email protected]
>----------
>From:  Chris Dupres[SMTP:[email protected]]
>Sent:  Monday, June 23, 1997 11:04 PM
>
>Hi Israel.
>
>You wrote:
>
>---snip---
>< The Interlock protects against severe mechanical and laser radiation
>hazards. The interlock system comprises of circuitry implemented on PCB.>
>---snip---
>< Components (Integrated circuits) that comprise the interlock system have
>pin spacings of less than 1.2 millimeters.>
>---snip---
>
>Wow, you are using semiconductors for an interlock system!  Maybe I
>misunderstand what you are doing....
>
>Surely an interlock system for a system with hazards as you describe
>requires a level of intrinsic safety way ahead of board level electronics. 
>The failure analysis would list far too many modes of failure that would
>allow your interlock to be compromised.
>
>An interlock designed for compliance to the Euro Machinery Directive, etc.
>etc. would require a minimum of two independently powered relay contacts in
>series, with cross connected contacts to detect a seized relay and prevent
>re-energisation.  Two 3mm airgaps in series (open relay contacts) are
>orders of magnitude more reliable than anything laid down on a non
>conducting plane like a pcb, when the degree of pollution on that material
>is unpredictable under any conditions.
>
>Interlocks need to be intrinsically safe, i.e. will always fail OFF in the
>event of a fault....Any fault, including a spider crawling across your pcb,
>or electrolytically grown trees across your conductors in high humidity, or
>a solder splash, or whatever, will cause your interlock to be negated.
>
>Semiconductors are best avoided like the safety plague they are in
>interlocks.  They fail in quite unpredicable ways, sometimes S/C, sometimes
>O/C, and for a multitude of reasons.
>
>Safety is two bits of metal separated by a nice air gap.  Safety is not a
>PN junction a couple of microns thick that happens to be missing a few free
>carriers, on a bit of insulating material that is the perfect vehicle for
>conductive media such as water, dust, corrosion effects, dirt generally
>etc.to accumulate on.
>
>I'll get down out of my tree now,  interlocks and intrinsic safety is a bit
>of a hobby horse with me.
>
>Have a good day.
>
>Chris Dupres
>Surrey, UK.
>

Reply via email to