I have read, with great interest, the first two responses to this
question and am not in complete agreement with them.  I guess that this
shows that there are multiple approaches to any compliance issue and
arguments can be made for any of them.  With that said, I'll give my
opinion on the most appropriate approach towards demonstrating
compliance with the EMC Directive.

As a motor driven appliance without any digital electronics or
microprocessors, EN 55014 and EN 55104 apply as a product standards.
The generic EMC standards
should apply only if there are no applicable product standards.  EN
55022 and EN 55011 are product standards for ITE and for ISM RF
equipment.  Note that 55011 is for devices that generate RF
intentionally, either for treatment of material or for internal use.  A
microwave oven is an ISM device.  EN 55014/55104 are product standards
for devices that contain motors and switching/regulating devices
including heating functions.  Although these standards both contain the
phrase "household" in their titles, upon reading the scope of these
standards, it is stated that they also apply to non-household (similar)
devices.  

As to be expected for these devices that generally do not contain high
frequency emissions sources, EN 55014 consists of conducted emissions
tests only.  Potential RF radiation from the powerline is checked via a
30-300 MHz emissions test of the powerline using a CISPR 16 absorbing
clamp.  Discontinuous, transient (click) emissions from motor control,
or power regulation functions are evaluated to a relaxed limit based on
the frequency of the transients.

EN 55104 requires further classification of the equipment to determine
the applicable immunity tests.  A mains powered device without any
oscillators or clocks operating above 15 MHz is a Category II device,
which requires ESD, EFT/B, conducted RF immunity (150 kHz - 230 MHz),
surge and voltage dips/interruptions testing.  Test levels are
approximately equivalent to the light industrial generic immunity spec.,
however, no radiated immunity is required.

Hope this helps.

Doug Frazee
EMC Compliance Engineer
Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
Advanced Technology Applications
401 Defense Highway
Annapolis, Maryland  21401
USA
Tel:    (410) 266-1793
FAX:    (410) 266-1853
[email protected]



>----------
>From:  [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
>Sent:  Tuesday, August 19, 1997 5:01 PM
>To:    [email protected]
>Subject:       Which EMC Directive Standards might apply here?
>
>Good Day List,
>
>I am trying to determine what tests apply under the EMC
>directive to a piece of chemistry lab equipment.  The device
>is a small table-top "agitator" to mix up containers of "goop".
>(note my chemistry terminology is limited.)
>
>The device in question has a variable speed 24VDC motor
>controlled by pulse width modulation.  The PWM chopper
>operates around 20 kHz.  The device plugs into a wall
>outlet (120VAC or 240VAC) There are no microprocessors, or
>any digital electronics in the device.
>
>My experience has been in ITE testing, using the ITE emissions
>standard and the Generic Immunity Standard.  I expect the
>Generic standards (emissions & immunity) would apply to the
>"goop mixer".  Does this sound correct?  Does the Generic
>emissions standard essentially boil down to EN 55022?
>
>I suspect this last question may be slightly controversial:
>Assuming that EN 55022 applies, would this be a Class A or
>Class B device?  The device is sold only to educational /
>research facilities, not the general public.
>
>Any opinions would be most appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Bob Sykes
>
>

Reply via email to