John,

My understanding of IEC1010 is that IEC742 only applies to transformers
that are stand-alone (not built in). Transformers that are built-in need
only comply with the requirements in IEC1010. While there is no specific
section for transformers in IEC1010,  there is a section for doing short
circuit tests on secondary windings (4.4.2.6). The transformers would
also have to meet the applicable spacing requirements in Annex D and the
dielectric strength requirements in 6.8 and other construction
requirements as they apply (e.g., double insulation, etc.). Regarding
IEC950, I can't think of an instance where a transformer that met IEC950
requirements would not also meet or exceed the IEC1010 requirements.
There may be some conditions where it wouldn't, but I haven't run into
one yet. I would challenge the interpretation that you received.

Regards,
Mike Rains
Foxboro Co.
>----------
>From:  [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
>Sent:  Wednesday, February 05, 1997 7:58AM
>To:    [email protected]
>Cc:    [email protected]
>Subject:       Re: Transformer Approvals
>
>Just wanted to thank you for your explanation. In this case, the 
>transformers are built in to the instrument, behind a panel that 
>requires a 'tool' (key locked) to gain entry. I did have some 
>confusion about this, because as you indicated, IEC 1010 doesn't 
>specify a specific transformer standard to follow. 
>
>I guess that we now have (2) choices -
>
>1. Purchase and install transformers that have IEC 742 certification.
>     - or -
>2. Purchase copies of both IEC 742 and IEC 950 and evaluate
>whether the IEC 950 certified transformers meet the requirements
>of IEC 742 for our equipment. This *may* involve additional testing
>and would most certainly be more time consuming. Potentially it could 
>be less costly in the long run, as domestic manufacturers of general 
>purpose transformers seem to only be offering products with IEC 950 
>compliance. To get a transformer with IEC 742  compliance, I'd have 
>to switch from using Signal Transformer to Legrand or some other 
>European company.
>
>-----------------------------------------
>John Bielot
>Canberra Industries           
>Applied Systems Division
>e-mail:  [email protected]
>-----------------------------------------
>>
>>On 04-Feb-97 you wrote
>>
>>
>>Hello from San Diego:
>>
>>
>>IEC 742 (aka EN 60742) applies to transformers in general and
>>stand-alone transformers in particular.
>>
>>IEC 742 contains some additional requirements for stand-alone
>>transformers compared to those in IEC 950 (aka EN 60950).
>>
>>Unfortunately, IEC 1010 (aka EN 61010) does not contain specific
>>transformer requirements, so IEC 742 can be invoked if the test
>>house so chooses.
>>
>>If your transformer is built-in, then I believe a transformer
>>complying with IEC 950 also complies with IEC 742.
>>
>>It may be that the test house is simply saying that an IEC 950
>>certified transformer, by definition (not by test), does not 
>>comply with IEC 742.  In other words, they cannot accept, carte
>>blanche, the IEC 950 certification as being applicable to 
>>IEC 1010, whereas they could accept IEC 742 certification.
>>
>>This may mean that the test house will need to conduct tests to
>>demonstrate compliance with IEC 1010.
>>
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Rich
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------
> >Richard Nute                             Quality Department 
> >Hewlett-Packard Company           Product Regulations Group 
> >San Diego Division (SDD)          Tel   :      619 655 3329 
> >16399 West Bernardo Drive         FAX   :      619 655 4979 
> >San Diego, California 92127       e-mail:  [email protected] 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

Reply via email to