------------------------ From: "Peter E. Perkins" <[email protected]> Subject: Are all these agencies really necessary? Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 01:57:41 -0400 To: Dan Mitchell <[email protected]> Cc: PSNetwork <[email protected]>
> PSNet & Dan, > The OM (Overall Mark) is a good idea > Developing nations have figured out > that they can easily play this game - just adapt the international > standards - ISO/IEC/CISPR, etc. - but demand a local mark. The > country supports a team of technical and bureauocratic personel > thru the > tax that you pay to get their bumper sticker. > I predict that it > will get worse before it gets better... > So, look at it as job security > Peter E Perkins > Principal Product Safety Consultant > Tigard, ORe 97281-3427 > > +1/503/452-1201 phone/fax > > [email protected] email Since this will be a thoroughly inclusive compliance mark, the mother of all testing, let's call it the Multipurpose Overall Mark; MoM (she knows what's best for you!). :-) Ed -------------------------- Ed Price [email protected] Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA. USA 619-505-2780 List-Post: [email protected] Date: 09/10/1998 Time: 10:54:43 -------------------------- --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
