Yes - One mark, one process would be nice. 
Thank you
Charles Grasso
(Captain Hook)
EMC Engineer
StorageTek
2270 Sth 88th Street
Louisville CO 80027 MS 4262
[email protected]
Tel:(303)673-2908
Fax(303)661-7115


> ----------
> From:         Dan Mitchell[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Reply To:     [email protected]
> Sent:         Thursday, September 10, 1998 11:52 AM
> To:   Grasso, Charles (Chaz); 'emc-pstc'
> Subject:      RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
> 
> The OM was just an example for purposes of illustration.  A better name
> for 
> such a hypothetical beast would be World Mark (WM).  If you read the 
> earlier thread, you would have read that all the agencies are getting out 
> of hand and that it would be nice to do testing once, then apply for a OM?
> 
>  or WM? and be allowed to sell your product any place in the world
> 
> Daniel W. Mitchell
> Product Safety
> EOS Corp.
> 
> ----------
> From:         Grasso, Charles (Chaz)[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:         Thursday, September 10, 1998 10:25 AM
> To:   Dan Mitchell; 'Peter E. Perkins'
> Cc:   PSNetwork
> Subject:      RE: Are all these agencies really necessary?
> 
> Would someone please explain the OM (Overall Mark)?
> Thank you
> Charles Grasso
> (Captain Hook)
> EMC Engineer
> StorageTek
> 2270 Sth 88th Street
> Louisville CO 80027 MS 4262
> [email protected]
> Tel:(303)673-2908
> Fax(303)661-7115
> 
> 
> > ----------
> > From:       Peter E. Perkins[SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Reply To:   Peter E. Perkins
> > Sent:       Wednesday, September 09, 1998 11:57 PM
> > To:         Dan Mitchell
> > Cc:         PSNetwork
> > Subject:    Are all these agencies really necessary?
> >
> > PSNet & Dan,
> >
> >
> >         The OM (Overall Mark) is a good idea that continues to be 
> promoted
> > by industry, especially multinational businesses.  Oh that they had
> > control
> > to proscribe it...  Remember that the underlying basis for all of this
> is
> > a
> > political issue in that nations want to control commerce in some manner
> -
> > and many of the old-time controls have been taken away by treaty (the 
> GATT
> > Treaty).  We work in an arena where the high level politicians tug and
> > pull
> > to get their way.  We see it in the expansion of the need to  have a
> > certification or mark on the products.  Developing nations have figured
> > out
> > that they can easily play this game - just adapt the international
> > standards - ISO/IEC/CISPR, etc. - but demand a local mark of approval. 
> The
> > country supports a team of technical and bureauocratic personel thru the
> > tax that you pay to get their bumper sticker.  Americans, especially, 
> like
> > free enterprise = no restraints.  Big business promoted the use of a
> > manufacturer's based mark for Europe (the CE marking), but were not too
> > happy that there is personal criminal penalty attached to signing the 
> MDoC
> > and applying the mark.    Much of the rest of the world isn't ready for
> > the
> > whole potato all at once either.  Note the problems that the Japanese
> and
> > the Koreans are having trying to reform their old-boy networks to open
> > their markets and offer opportunity for growth there...  I predict that 
> it
> > will get worse before it gets better...  So, look at it as job security,
> > at
> > least you're working (which is better than the alternative)...
> >
> >
> >         - - - - -
> >
> >         Peter E Perkins
> >         Principal Product Safety Consultant
> >         Tigard, ORe  97281-3427
> >
> >         +1/503/452-1201 phone/fax
> >
> >         [email protected]      email
> >
> >         visit our website:
> >
> >                 http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/peperkins
> >
> >         - - - - -
> >
> > ---------
> > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
> > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> > quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
> > [email protected], or [email protected] (the list
> > administrators).
> >
> 

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], or [email protected] (the list
administrators).

Reply via email to