-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Bailin Ma <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Grounding of screen room
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 98 9:18:11 PDT
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: Mekonen Buzuayene <[email protected]>, Mekonen Buzuayene
<[email protected]>


Hi Ed,

Yes, I agree. The way you suggested is an ideal method to get 
Ambient noise 
in the Conducted emission test.   Please allow me to make two more 
points 
about impedance vs. frequency:

(1) It is inconvenient in practice to find "a resistive load sized 
to draw 
the same amount of power."  We have to make the equivalent load 
first, 
connect it to a power cord, and then plug the power cord into EUT 
port of 
the LISN. If we consider the equivalent load should be not only at 
60 Hz, 
also "equivalent" on 150 KHz - 30 MHz to the EUT, it would become 
much more 
troublesome. As a matter of fact, the frequency range of 150 KHz - 
30 MHz 
is of our interest.

(2) From the standpoint of spectrum analyzer, does it make lot of 
difference between using open circuit and equivalent load on EUT 
port of 
the LISN to detect the Ambient noise on 150 KHz - 30 MHz? 
 
Please correct me.
Best Regards,
Barry Ma
-------------

(Original text snipped as it was getting too ragged)

Barry:

You don't have to provide a dummy load which is the precise analog of the 
equipment to be tested. All you want to do is draw some fundamental power. 
Since I do Mil testing, I see power busses of 28VDC, 120/208 60Hz and 120/208 
400Hz.

To keep it simple, I constructed a load bank consisting of 16 surface mount 
light bulb sockets, all wired in parallel. I just screw in an array of 
25/60/75/100 Watt rated lamps until I get the necessary current. Sure, there's 
some unknown slight lead inductances and capacitances. But all I want to do is 
draw a few amps DC, and this setup works pretty well.

Ideally, it shouldn't make any difference between no-load and full-load 
conditions on the LISN. Your power source should be clean and quiet, your 
shielded enclosure powerline filters should be very effective, and your LISN 
also provides some filtering. But, in the real world, your power source may be 
very noisy, with additional RF environment currents induced onto the powerlines.

Some people may try to measure CE without a shielded enclosure; that should 
only be as a last resort. If you bought cheap powerline filters, or if you 
built them yourself, you can have two types of problems. First, your inductor 
design may not handle the DC current without going into magnetic saturation. 
The decreased incremental permeability will result in a dramatic drop in 
inductance, which will decrease the filter's filtering ability.

Second, the inductor may have been physically damaged during filter assembly. I 
have seen cracked toroids and poorly stacked laminated cores which have 
resulted in the filter creating harmonic energy content that wasn't in the 
original AC power.

I suppose that what I'm saying is that if you are creating a new measurement 
setup for each job you work on, I would measure the Ambient CE each time I do a 
CE test. I would be suspicious about the power source, filtering, etc. But, if 
you have a stable test setup, to which you bring product after product, I would 
suggest that you measure the ambient CE only periodically, maybe once a week, 
or at some other comfortable interval.

Of course, this advice doesn't pertain to those doing Mil-Std-461/462D testing, 
since that spec REQUIRES an Ambient at the time of each emission test.

Regards,

Ed


--------------------------
Ed Price
[email protected]
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA.  USA
619-505-2780
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 10/07/98
Time: 12:18:32
--------------------------

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to