This topic can open a can of worms. (Sort of like the class B vs.
class A argument for Europe.)
I don't believe there's a margin of compliance with the limit spelled
out in any regulations or standards. The standards set a limit and
leave it up to the manufacturer to meet that limit. EN55022/CISPR22
does refer to the statistical method of assuring with 80% confidence
level that 80% of the product type is below the limit, but this
requires testing at least 5 product samples. I think most companies
prefer to test 1 sample for qualification and then from time to time
perform an audit test on a production sample taken at random.
Given a test sample size of 1 and the measurement variables
(measurement uncertainty, product to product variations, test site to
test site variations, testing repeatability, ...to name just a
few...), I believe a 2 dB margin is not good enough to ensure your
product would pass a random audit test. At least not for radiated
emissions. (I might accept that for conducted emissions, which is
inherently a more stable and repeatable measurement. However, I would
probably insist on a larger sample size than 1 if the margin is only 2
dB.) In general, for compliance measurements, I prefer to work with a
5 dB or greater margin with the applicable limit.
Jim Hulbert
Senior EMC Engineer
Pitney Bowes
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Required Margin for EMI?
Author: <[email protected] (Scott Douglas) > at SMTPGWY
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 10/26/98 12:50 PM
Hello all,
When doing EMI scans of ITE, I have always worked with a margin of 2 dB
less than the actual limit. No test house I have ever been to will give a
"meets the requirements..." without having this margin. Can anyone point
out if this is an actual requirement built into any of the standards, i.e.
EN 55022 or FCC Part 15, etc. and if so, where is it in writing?
I understand about measurement errors, product to product differences and
repeatability of testing issues. Just want to know if the 2dB margin is
actually written into law.
Thanks for your comments.
Scott
[email protected]
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).
Received: from tsap.ct.pb.com by smtppc.ct.pb.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.01.01)
; Mon, 26 Oct 98 15:53:36 -0500
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from micro2.ct.pb.com by tsap.ct.pb.com (5.65v4.0/1.1.3.6)
id AA21305; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 15:49:31 -0500
Received: by micro2.pb.com (5.65v4.0/1.1.3.6)
id AA11536; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 15:48:44 -0500
Received: by ruebert.ieee.org (8.8.8/8.8.8)
id MAA11351 for emc-pstc-resent; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:49:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:50:00 -0500
Subject: Required Margin for EMI?
To: [email protected]
From: [email protected] (Scott Douglas)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [email protected] (Scott Douglas)
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <[email protected]>
X-Listname: emc-pstc
X-Info: Help requests to [email protected]
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to [email protected]
X-Moderator-Address: [email protected]