Hi,

In the interest of not divulging proprietary info, I will not
specify the companies involved although I can say that I
have never worked for either the manufacturer or the
test lab.

But I have seen a final report from a very reputable lab
and written for a very reputable company that only
had 0.7dB of margin under the legal limit.  The emission
was generated by the EUT.

Furthermore, the report was a formal FCC Class B
Grant Certification submittal and the FCC issued
the Grant.

I have worked at companies that imposed an internal
requirement of as little as 3dB below the limit on a
one off sample.

The final decision on margin required is usually a blend of
business and technical factors, each case being different.

Regards,
Tony Fredriksson
NET

Scott Douglas wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> When doing EMI scans of ITE, I have always worked with a margin of 2 dB
> less than the actual limit. No test house I have ever been to will give a
> "meets the requirements..." without having this margin. Can anyone point
> out if this is an actual requirement built into any of the standards, i.e.
> EN 55022 or FCC Part 15, etc. and if so, where is it in writing?
>
> I understand about measurement errors, product to product differences and
> repeatability of testing issues. Just want to know if the 2dB margin is
> actually written into law.
>
> Thanks for your comments.
> Scott
> [email protected]
>
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected], or
> [email protected] (the list administrators).


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to