Chris the approach you have mentioned is not too different than the one
adopted by ETSI. ETSI has adopted the "shared risk" approach to setting
limits. The standards specify the limits and the maximum allowed measurement
uncertainty. Any measured value up to and including the limit is acceptable
as long as the measurement uncertainty has not been exceeded.

        ----------
        From:  Chris Dupres [SMTP:[email protected]]
        Sent:  Tuesday, October 27, 1998 2:16 AM
        To:  emc-pstc
        Subject:  EMC limits.

        EMC Folk.

        I have been reading all the learned submissions of what constitutes
the
        acceptable emission limits for EMC purposes.  Most of you are very
clever,
        very technical, and I'm in awe of all of you.

        But there seems to be a bit of a missed point here.  EMC in Europe
relates
        to the EMC Directive, which was born of the SIngle Market
arrangements
        between Euro States, and which were born of the Treaty of Rome way
back
        before my kids were born.

        The ultimate purpose of EMC Standards/limits is to provide a level
trading
        platform for Euro countries, so that all conditions are equal in the
market
        place, and that no-one can steal a lead over someone else by
dropping
        technical standards and therefore saving costs and putting cheaper
goods on
        the market.   It follows that perhaps we should look at these limits
in the
        same way that the packaging industry looks at filling cans and
bottles, or
        the way car drivers treat speed limits.  i.e, that the EMC emission
limits
        are a target in absolute terms, and if you can show honest intent in
        achieving them, then the legislation has achieved it's aim.

        If I carry out an honest emissions test on a piece of equipment, and
the
        graph is below the line by the thickness of the pen, then I believe
that
        the spirit of the EMC Directive has been met.  If this acceptance
level was
        an absolute amount, such as money in banking, then I would allow a %
for
        measurement error, but it isn't, it's an objective.  No-ones head is
going
        to explode if the emissions are 0.5dB over limit, and in all honesty
        dropping the emissions by 0.5dB can usually be achieved by moving a
cable
        or snapping on a ferrite sleeve.  Hardly enough to change the whole
balance
        of trade in Europe is it?

        So, if I carry out properly conducted tests, with the equipment
working
        normally, and it shows emissions right on the limit, then I think
the EMC
        Directive has been followed, and the equipment can be CE marked with
        honesty and placed on the market.

        Just a tuppence worth (what's THAT in Euro's?)

        Chris Dupres
        Surrey, UK.




        ---------
        This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
        with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
        [email protected], [email protected], or
        [email protected] (the list administrators).

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to