Hi, The Machinery Directive (and many others) was amended by the "CE marking directive" 93/68/EEC (OJ L220, 8/30/93, page 8) to remove the year of manufacture from the "CE" marking. The same Directive also amended, Annex I, Clause 1.7.3 to require "- the year of construction." to be on the unit.
Ned Devine Entela, Inc. Program Manager III Toll Free: 1 800 888 3787 Ext. 671 Direct: 1 616 248 9671 Fax: 1 616 574 9752 e-mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: George, David L [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 10:39 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: question (re: 98/37/EC Lisa: There seems to be one difference. Can anyone verify how the date code is to be displayed? As in the old directive, Directive 98/37/EC requires the use of the year of manufacture. The old Directive indicated the year of manufacture should be a part of the CE mark, The new Directive appears to specify the year of manufacture is to placed on the product label. Does anyone have information about where the year is to be indicated and what happened to the year with the CE mark? Dave George Unisys -----Original Message----- From: Art Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 4:32 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: question (re: 98/37/EC Hello Lisa, 98/37/EC is a re-issue of the original Machinery Directive (89/392/EEC) along with all of its amendments to that re-issue. 98/37/EC can be found in the EC's Official Journal (OJ, L 207, pages 1-46, dated 23 July 1998. Regards, Art Michael, Editor - Int'l Product Safety News * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * International Product Safety Bookshop * * Check out our current offerings! * * <http://www.safetylink.com/bookshop.html> * * A new service of the Safety Link * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - On Tue, 24 Nov 1998 [email protected] wrote: > Can someone confirm for me that the machinery Directive is now 98/37/EC? > ..or is this an ammendment to the original? > > > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). > > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
