George, Sorry I think you are confused. The year of manufacture was never required under the Machinery Directive! The Declaration of Conformity is required to specify the date when the CE Mark for the particular model was first applied.
There is no date code marking requirement for the product or DoC. Regards, From: "George, David L" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Copies to: [email protected] Subject: RE: question (re: 98/37/EC Date sent: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:39:04 -0500 Send reply to: "George, David L" <[email protected]> > Lisa: > There seems to be one difference. Can anyone verify how the date code > is to be displayed? As in the old directive, Directive 98/37/EC > requires the use of the year of manufacture. The old Directive > indicated the year of manufacture should be a part of the CE mark, The > new Directive appears to specify the year of manufacture is to placed on > the product label. Does anyone have information about where the year is > to be indicated and what happened to the year with the CE mark? > Dave George > Unisys > > -----Original Message----- > From: Art Michael [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 4:32 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: question (re: 98/37/EC > > Hello Lisa, > > 98/37/EC is a re-issue of the original Machinery > Directive (89/392/EEC) > along with all of its amendments to that re-issue. > 98/37/EC can be found > in the EC's Official Journal (OJ, L 207, pages 1-46, > dated 23 July 1998. > > Regards, Art Michael, Editor - Int'l Product Safety News > > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * * > * International Product Safety > Bookshop * > * Check out our current offerings! > * > * > <http://www.safetylink.com/bookshop.html> * > * A new service of the Safety Link > * > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * * > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > > > On Tue, 24 Nov 1998 [email protected] wrote: > > > Can someone confirm for me that the machinery > Directive is now 98/37/EC? > > ..or is this an ammendment to the original? > > > > > > > > --------- > > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion > list. > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to > [email protected] > > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without > the > > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > > [email protected], [email protected], or > > [email protected] (the list administrators). > > > > > > > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion > list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to > [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without > the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). > --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
