Hello Richard,

No other requirements are necessary for your products then "manufacturers
declaration", based on EMC and/or LVD requirements/tests, who are backed up
by appropriate standards to attach the ce-mark and export to europe. Make
sure safety instructions are in the right European language. Although the
lVD directive does not insist on this, local authorities are keen on
maintaining safety.  If any  problems occcur, directly contact the European
Commission by means of the appropriate office for compliants. Make sure you
have a representative in Europe, who can be contacted for inspection of
technical files.

Regards,

Gert Gremmen  Ing.

== Ce-test, Qualified testing ==
Consultants in EMC, Electrical safety and Telecommunication
Compliance tests for European standards and ce-marking
Member of NEC/IEC voting committee for EMC.
Our Web presence: http://www.cetest.nl
List of current harmonized standards http://www.cetest.nl/emc-harm.htm
15 great tips for the EMC-designer http://www.cetest.nl/features01.htm






-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: WOODS, RICHARD <[email protected]>
Aan: 'emc-pstc' <[email protected]>
Datum: woensdag 22 april 1998 21:02
Onderwerp: GS Requirements


>Equipment sold in Germany must comply with the GS requirements. Somewhere
in
>the bowels of the German Government, there must be a list of standards that
>must be met in order to comply with the GS requirements. Does anyone know
>where one can find this list? What agency is responsible for
>maintaining/changing the list? Is there a legal methodology that must be
>followed in order to change the list, especially a public notice prior to
>the change? Given that a change is going to take place, are there standard
>transition rules?
>
>The particular case at hand is that TUV has informed me that the EMF human
>exposure standards have changed. VDE 0848 parts 2 and 4 have been replaced
>by ENV 50166-1 and ENV 50166-2. Any further information that anyone has in
>this regard would be helpful, especially information on any transition
>rules.
>
>
>Richard Woods
>Sensormatic Electronics
>[email protected]
>Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
>Sensormatic.
>

Reply via email to