On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:25:51 -0800, Jon Griver wrote:
>------------------------
>  From: Jon Griver <[email protected]>
>  Subject: Medical Device Directive, IEC 601-1-2, and IEC 1000-3-2
>  Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:52:16 +0300 
>  To: [email protected]
>
>> Patrick,
>> 
>> 1) EN 60601-1-2 just covers EMC, while the scope the Medical Devices 
>> Directive includes safety, risk analysis, medical efficacy, biocompatibily, 
>> software validation, etc.
My job responsibilities involve EMC, so I tend to have narrow focus.
Should the original sentence should have read:
        A manufacturer can claim his system complies with the Medical Device
        Directive by testing to EN 60601-1.
I think EN 60601-1 Amendment 1 includes the reference to EN 60601-1-2.

>> Medical products are classified into Classes, 1, 11a, 11b and 111. Self 
>> declaration can be used for most, but not all, Class 1 products (the least 
>> critical). Even this this case, self declaration is based on a technical 
>> file that includes much more than EN 60601-1-2.
>> 
>> In all other cases, approval is via a Notified Body under the Medical 
>> Devices Directive. Approval covers the manufacturer as well as the product, 
>> as some level of ISO 9000 approval is required. The ISO 9000 audit is 
>> carried out by the Notified Body itself. There is a complex relationship 
>> between the Class of product and the level of ISO 9000 approval required.
>> 
>> 2) EN 60601-1-2 does have ESD requirements, but to IEC 801-2, which is older 
>> than IEC 1000-3-2.
>> 
>> 3) EMC requirements for medical equipment are covered by the Medical Devices 
>> Directive, not the EMC Directive. So if harmonics are not mentioned in EN 
>> 60601-1-2, then it is not required.
>> 
>> Jon Griver
>> ITL (Product Testing) Ltd.
>> http://www.itl.co.il
>> 
>> >
>> >I was asked the following question, and wasn't sure about the answer:
>> >
>> >1) A manufacturer can claim his system complies with the Medical Device
>> >Directive by testing to EN 60601-1-2:1993.
>> >
>> >2) EN 60601-1-2:1993 does not have any requirements to test to IEC 1000-3-2.
>> >
>> >3) Does that mean that the harmonic standard does not apply to this system 
>> >when
>> >it becomes mandatory in 2001?
>> >
>> >
>> >I realize the Second Edition of IEC60601-1-2 is just around the corner, and
>> >that edition _does_ call out the harmonic test.  However, I've been told 
>> >that
>> >it may not take effect until 2003.
>> >--
>> >Patrick Lawler
>> >[email protected]
>> >
>> >---------
>> >This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
>> >To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
>> >with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
>> >quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
>> >[email protected], [email protected], or
>> >[email protected] (the list administrators).
>> >
>> 
>
>---------------End of Original Message-----------------
>
>--------------------------
>Ed Price
>[email protected]
>Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
>Cubic Defense Systems
>San Diego, CA.  USA
>619-505-2780
>Date: 06/18/1999
>Time: 09:25:53
>Military & Avionics EMC Services Our Specialty
>Also Environmental / Metrology / Reliability

--
Patrick Lawler
[email protected]

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to