I think the issue is schedule impact, not direct cost of the test. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 6:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NEAR/ FAR FIELD CORRELATION ISSUES > > > Ed, please send this out only if you think it's appropriate. > > Hi folks, > > I don't want to run the risk of offending list members, but what's the > > problem over test costs? > > I charge little more than the chap that repairs my car, or the guy > that fixes > my A/C. > > EMC is a part of life, live with it. I speculate that most folks will > get > help early, and life will be OK. Some folks may not pay up front and > suffer > later: this is not a new lesson. > > Rather than try to change test methods that work fine, even if they > could be > a little better, take a close look at where your facility money > goes..... > then charge what should be charged, not what you can get away with! > > If anyone wants to criticize me, e-mail direct. Or call, 815 637 3729. > > My humble opinion, > > Derek Walton > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], or > [email protected] (the list administrators). >
--------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
