I was under the impression that we were discussion the "Cost-effective" emc
testing solutions, not the cost-absurd solutions. Maybe salt mines are going
for a lot less these days. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: roger.vi...@wwgsolutions.com [SMTP:roger.vi...@wwgsolutions.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 1999 2:28 AM
> To:   Lacey,Scott
> Cc:   'Price, Ed'; 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
> Subject:      RE: cost effective EMC facility
> 
> 
> 
> 
> A very large EMC test site has been operating underground in England for
> some
> years. This is in Cheshire where salt is mined, leaving large underground
> open
> spaces surrounded by absorbing salt-laden walls. The reduction in ambient
> emissions is another benefit of this site. As an article in the UK EMC
> Journal
> reports (http://www.emc-journal.co.uk/archive1/980402.html) , it is now
> run by
> Celestica.
> 
> Roger Viles
> WWG
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Lacey,Scott" <sla...@foxboro.com> on 04/08/99 16:37:09
> 
> Please respond to "Lacey,Scott" <sla...@foxboro.com>
> 
> To:   "'Price, Ed'" <ed.pr...@cubic.com>
> cc:   "'emc-p...@ieee.org'" <emc-p...@ieee.org> (bcc: Roger
> Viles/PLY/Global)
> 
> Subject:  RE: cost effective EMC facility
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ed,
> 
> I find your idea of a salt water ground plane very intriguing. I imagine
> the
> salts used would involve more than just table salt, and the chemistry
> would
> have to be checked and adjusted regularly, similar to a swimming pool. The
> problem of stratification could easily be solved with circulator pumps,
> which would be turned off just prior to actual use (those of you near
> fault
> lines might take advantage of natural agitation, your salt water pools
> would
> be "shaken, not stirred").   : )
> 
> On a related note, does anyone have any experience doing EMC scans below
> ground? It seems that the earth would be about the lowest cost shielding
> material available. Perhaps an updated and enlarged version of the early
> pioneers "soddie" (sod hut) might be just the ticket. It might even
> incorporate a salt water ground plane. A side benefit would be that EMC
> engineers might gain some useful exercise by swimming a few laps at lunch
> time (how many laps around the turntable/raft equals one mile?).  : )
> 
> Scott Lacey
> 
>      -----Original Message-----
>      From:     Price, Ed [SMTP:ed.pr...@cubic.com]
>      Sent:     Monday, August 02, 1999 5:35 PM
>      To:  'Arun Kaore'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
>      Subject:  RE: cost effective EMC facility
> 
> 
>      Arun:
> 
>      I was just struck by what you said about "setup a Sea Plane or a
> salt water
>      based  site" . Has anyone ever set up an OATS using salt water as
> the ground
>      plane? Talk about excellent surface smoothness, easy to level and
> cheap
>      material, plus simple repair! (Uhh, could we say it fixes itself?)
> 
>      Just what conductivity would be enough? Could we get enough
> conductivity
>      before we reach salt saturation?
> 
>      I suppose the upper limit on surface area would be when we get to
> the point
>      of the wind causing surface ripples. Or gravitational tides.
> 
>      Turntables might be a lot cheaper, too. Just a thin raft that
> floats.
> 
>      Seriously, has anyone tried this for an OATS? (I seem to recall the
> US Navy
>      had a really big ship simulator here in San Diego, where they placed
> scale
>      models of ships on a sheet-steel "sea" in order to model HF wire
> antennas.)
> 
>      Regards,
> 
>      Ed
> 
> 
> :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-
> ):
>      -):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
>      Ed Price
>      ed.pr...@cubic.com
>      Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
>      Cubic Defense Systems
>      San Diego, CA.  USA
>      619-505-2780 (Voice)
>      619-505-1502 (Fax)
>      Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
>      Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
> 
> :-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-
> ):
>      -):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
> 
> 
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> 

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to