Vitaly,

Noun Derivative:  I don't know about the rest of you, but I have been
feeling like a "schlepper" for quite some time.  I have not been able to put
a name on it until now.  (MS Word 97 does NOT recognize the noun form,
"schlepper.")

Jim Knighten

P.S.:  As an indication of how informative this exchange has been for me, I
looked up Sisyphus (see Ed Price, below) on the web.  Ed's use of this Greek
mythological character is most appropriate.  See the quote below:

"The original Sysyphus was a greek king only spoken of in legends.

He was known only for the splendor of his life, and for the measure of his
payment in the afterlife. We can only imagine the splendor of his reign, and
only imagine the extent of the price paid by his subjects to sustain this
life of luxury.

Forever, in a place not far removed from the fields of Elysium, Sysyphus was
to spend eternity toiling in moving a boulder up the face of a mountain.
Each agonized moment of the day he would move the colossal rock up the steep
mountainside, glimpsing the idylls of those who had rightly spent their
lives, the heros and well-loved, only a small way away and without care,
whilst he toiled to pay for his own life.

At the end of each day, not nearly at the end of his labor, our Sysyphus
would fail, falling into exhaustion and laying prone beside the object of
his eternal effort as it cavorted down the face of the mountain, only for
him to regain his place, pushing it up the mountain again.

Perhaps this would explain the thunder that would be heard at the end of
day, when the day was hard and hot, when no storm was near.
We will spare no effort in bringing you the opulence of that kingdom, no
obstacle will be left unscaled.

Tristan
[email protected]"
 

Dr. Jim Knighten                e-mail: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Senior Consulting Engineer
NCR
17095 Via del Campo
San Diego, CA 92127             http://www.ncr.com <http://www.ncr.com> 
Tel: 619-485-2537
Fax: 619-485-3788


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Gorodetsky, Vitaly [SMTP:[email protected]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, May 05, 1999 10:03 AM
        To:     'Knighten, James L'; [email protected]; 'Brent DeWitt';
Allen Tudor; [email protected]
        Subject:        RE: Precompliance Testing

        Ed,
        Thanks for your eloquent linguistic excursion.  I am wondering
whether there
        is a noun derivative from SCHLEP.  It could be a nice synonym for
Compliance
        Engineering and schlepper would be a recognizable term in everyone's
resume
        for compliance engineer.
        Best Regards
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Knighten, James L
[SMTP:[email protected]]
        > Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 3:57 PM
        > To:   [email protected]; Knighten, James L; 'Brent DeWitt'; Allen
Tudor;
        > [email protected]; Gary McInturff
        > Subject:      RE: Precompliance Testing
        > 
        > Ed and Others, 
        > 
        > Thanks for the lesson in colloquial jargon.
        > 
        > Obviously, I have been schlepping all these many years and did not
realize
        > it.
        > 
        > Just a final note:  MS Word 97's spell checker recognizes both
"schlep"
        > and
        > "schlepping."
        > 
        > Jim
        > 
        > Dr. Jim Knighten              e-mail: [email protected]
        > <mailto:[email protected]> 
        > Senior Consulting Engineer
        > NCR
        > 17095 Via del Campo
        > San Diego, CA 92127           http://www.ncr.com
<http://www.ncr.com> 
        > Tel: 619-485-2537
        > Fax: 619-485-3788
        > 
        > 
        >       -----Original Message-----
        >       From:   [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
        >       Sent:   Monday, May 03, 1999 5:40 PM
        >       To:     Knighten, James L; 'Brent DeWitt'; Allen Tudor;
        > [email protected]; Gary McInturff
        >       Subject:        RE: Precompliance Testing
        > 
        >       James:
        > 
        >       Schlep is a little descriptive verb I learned during a three
year
        > long exile in Northern New Jersey. It's Yiddish, meaning to haul,
to drag,
        > to sweat, to expend considerable energy with little reward and no
respect.
        > It's five steps forward and four steps back, plus you stub your
toe. And
        > there's a rock in your shoe. And you just might be developing a
blister.
        > Sisyphus was a schlepper.
        > 
        >       Yes, it's certainly a military term, although each service
and era
        > assigns a new name to it. But, now that I think about it, maybe a
trip to
        > the parking lot doesn't quite measure up to schlepping.
        > 
        >       ;-)
        >       Ed
        > 
        > 
        > 
        >       ------------------------
        >         From: "Knighten, James L"
<[email protected]>
        >         Subject: RE: Precompliance Testing
        >         Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 15:37:35 -0700 
        >         To: [email protected], 'Brent DeWitt'
<[email protected]>,
        > Allen Tudor <[email protected]>, [email protected], Gary
McInturff
        > <[email protected]>
        > 
        > 
        >       > Ed,
        >       > 
        >       > I'm not familiar with the verb "to schlep."  
        >       > 
        >       > Is this a specialized technical term, perhaps particular
to EMC or
        > to the
        >       > military arena?
        >       > 
        >       > Jim
        >       > 
        >       > Dr. Jim Knighten              e-mail: [email protected]
        >       > <mailto:[email protected]> 
        >       > Senior Consulting Engineer
        >       > NCR
        >       > 17095 Via del Campo
        >       > San Diego, CA 92127           http://www.ncr.com
        > <http://www.ncr.com> 
        >       > Tel: 619-485-2537
        >       > Fax: 619-485-3788
        >       > 
        >       > 
        >       >       -----Original Message-----
        >       >       From:   [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
        >       >       Sent:   Monday, May 03, 1999 2:38 PM
        >       >       To:     'Brent DeWitt'; Allen Tudor;
[email protected]; Gary
        >       > McInturff
        >       >       Subject:        RE: Precompliance Testing
        >       > 
        >       >       The roof alternative has been done more than a few
times.
        > Emaco (now
        >       > part of TUVPS) in San Diego had a pair of pneumatic lifts
which
        > travelled
        >       > from their second floor through the roof. The test
specimen and
        > antenna
        >       > could be set up on their respective elevators, pushed up
through
        > the roof,
        >       > and come to rest level with the roof ground plane.
        >       > 
        >       >       I imagine that they did have some problems with
weathering
        > of
        >       > conductive interfaces and water leakage, but it did serve
them
        > well for a
        >       > few years.
        >       > 
        >       >       BTW, I agree that the "parking lot" option is better
than
        > trying to
        >       > live with a test site WITHIN a commercial office
structure. There
        > have been
        >       > several posters who already described the problems found
inside
        > the
        >       > building. Some of the problems with a parking lot site
are:
        >       > 
        >       >       1. Sometimes the cars encroach on the site.
        >       >       2. You have to schlep all your stuff out to the
site, and
        > back again
        >       > at night.
        >       >       3. Sometimes, your utilities get mysteriously shut
off,
        >       > necessitating a call to your plant facilities guy (for a
big
        > company; for
        >       > little companies, you get to look for the breaker
yourself).
        >       >       4. Flooding.
        >       >       5. Wind can knock over your test antenna mast.
Securing the
        > mast
        >       > each night adds another housekeeping task.
        >       >       6. Sunburn. (If I'm gonna get sunburned, let it be
with a
        > yacht
        >       > beneath my feet.)
        >       >       7. Ants and rodents. (You are only one step short of
a
        > picnic.)
        >       >       8. Snow. Ice. Wind chill factor. (Enough said.)
        >       > 
        >       >       Ed
        >       >        
        >       > 
        >       >       Ed
        >       > 
        >       > 
        >       >       ------------------------
        >       >         From: Gary McInturff
<[email protected]>
        >       >         Subject: RE: Precompliance Testing
        >       >         Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 12:11:30 -0700 
        >       >         To: 'Brent DeWitt' <[email protected]>, Allen
Tudor
        >       > <[email protected]>, [email protected]
        >       > 
        >       > 
        >       >       > I'll agree with Brent, and others, the headaches
of a
        > metal room
        >       > or the
        >       >       > metal studs et al, in a building are going to make
you
        > pull your
        >       > hair out.
        >       >       > But there is an alternative to the parking lot.
You may
        > want to
        >       > consider the
        >       >       > roof. The ground reference can be put up there as
well,
        > especially
        >       > if you
        >       >       > are doing pre-compliance stuff. You don't have to
give up
        > parking
        >       > space -
        >       >       > which is sure to irate somebody. The roof gets a
little
        > hot, but
        >       > that only
        >       >       > gives you the opportunity to work in your cutoffs,
and
        > showing up
        >       > to a
        >       >       > meeting with the suits dressed like this is always
good
        > for a
        >       > laugh!
        >       >       > Gary
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       -----Original Message-----
        >       >       >       From:   Brent DeWitt
[SMTP:[email protected]]
        >       >       >       Sent:   Friday, April 23, 1999 7:12 PM
        >       >       >       To:     Allen Tudor; [email protected]
        >       >       >       Subject:        RE: Precompliance Testing
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       Allen,
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       From bunches of years of designing and using
sites,
        > what I
        >       > would
        >       >       > suggest is,
        >       >       >       IMHO, use the money to reserve a large space
in the
        > parking
        >       > lot free
        >       >       > of
        >       >       >       obstacles.  Current construction techniques
in
        > buildings use
        >       > lots of
        >       >       > steel
        >       >       >       "2x4s" for the walls and there will likely
be steel
        > in the
        >       > floor
        >       >       > above you.
        >       >       >       All of these contribute to resonances in the
        > emissions
        >       > measurements
        >       >       > that are
        >       >       >       far too difficult to want to deal with.  The
best
        > way to do
        >       > radiated
        >       >       >       measurements is to be a minimalist.  Get as
far away
        > from
        >       > any
        >       >       > structure as
        >       >       >       you can, put down a simple hardware cloth
ground
        > plane and
        >       > throw a
        >       >       > nylon
        >       >       >       tent over the product if it rains.
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       Best regards,
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       Brent DeWitt
        >       >       >       Datex-Ohmeda Medical
        >       >       >       Louisville, CO
        >       >       > 
        >       >       > 
        >       >       > 
        >       >       >       > -----Original Message-----
        >       >       >       > From: [email protected]
        >       >       >       >
[mailto:[email protected]]On
        > Behalf Of
        >       > Allen Tudor
        >       >       >       > Sent: Friday, April 23, 1999 1:27 PM
        >       >       >       > To: [email protected]
        >       >       >       > Subject: Precompliance Testing
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Our division is in the process of
constructing a
        > new
        >       > building.  I
        >       >       >       > have been told that I will be given a room
in
        > which to
        >       > make
        >       >       >       > pre-compliance radiated emissions
measurements.
        > However,
        >       > ferrite
        >       >       >       > tiles or cones are out of the question  (I
have
        > been told
        >       > that I
        >       >       >       > can hang "chicken-wire" on the walls if I
want
        > to).
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Even though I am restricted in how much
money can
        > be
        >       > spent, I
        >       >       >       > have the luxury of designing in features
as the
        > building
        >       > is being
        >       >       >       > constructed.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > At a bare minimum, I think we should lay
sheet
        > metal or
        >       > grid-wire
        >       >       >       > on the floor after the concrete is poured.
This
        > ground
        >       > plane
        >       >       >       > should be grounded at each corner by
ground rods.
        > I am
        >       > thinking
        >       >       >       > that if there is no steel framework near
the room,
        > this
        >       > may
        >       >       >       > provide fairly good results.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > I would appreciate any recommendations on
other
        > cheap
        >       > features
        >       >       >       > that I can design in  while the building
is under
        >       > construction.
        >       >       >       > Also, what is the minimum size the room
should be?
        > How
        >       > about
        >       >       >       > power wiring in the walls and in the
ceiling.
        > Should any
        >       >       >       > measures be taken to prevent radiated
energy from
        > coupling
        >       > into
        >       >       >       > power wiring?
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Perfection is not the key issue here:
        > repeatability is.
        >       > We have
        >       >       >       > a local certified lab that I can compare
my
        > measurements
        >       > with.
        >       >       >       > Once the room is complete, I can repeat my
        > measurements at
        >       > the
        >       >       >       > certified lab and develop the necessary
correction
        >       > factors.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > By the way, my product is dc powered
shelf-level
        > telecom
        >       >       > equipment.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Again, any advice will be appreciated.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Thanks in advance.
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       >
        >       >       >       > Allen Tudor, Compliance Engineer
        >       >       >       > PairGain Technologies
tel:
        > (919)875-3382
        >       >       >       > 2431-153 Spring Forest Rd.           fax:
        > (919)876-1817
        >       >       >       > Raleigh, NC  27615
        > email:
        >       >       >       > [email protected]
        >       > 
        >       >       --------------------------
        >       >       Ed Price
        >       >       [email protected]
        >       >       Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
        >       >       Cubic Defense Systems
        >       >       San Diego, CA.  USA
        >       >       619-505-2780
        >       >       Date: 05/03/1999
        >       >       Time: 13:37:40
        >       >       Military & Avionics EMC Services Our Specialty
        >       >       Also Environmental / Metrology / Reliability
        >       >       --------------------------
        >       > 
        >       > 
        >       > 
        >       >       ---------
        >       >       This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion
list.
        >       >       To cancel your subscription, send mail to
[email protected]
        >       >       with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc"
(without the
        >       >       quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
        >       >       [email protected], [email protected], or
        >       >       [email protected] (the list
administrators).
        >       > 
        > 
        >       ---------------End of Original Message-----------------
        > 
        >       --------------------------
        >       Ed Price
        >       [email protected]
        >       Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
        >       Cubic Defense Systems
        >       San Diego, CA.  USA
        >       619-505-2780
        >       Date: 05/03/1999
        >       Time: 16:40:21
        >       Military & Avionics EMC Services Our Specialty
        >       Also Environmental / Metrology / Reliability
        >       --------------------------
        >       
        > 
        > ---------
        > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        > To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
        > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        > quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
        > [email protected], [email protected], or
        > [email protected] (the list administrators).

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to