PSNet
I'm involved in a discussion concerning definitions... wot's you
opinion...
Exposed conductive part: conductive part of equipment, which can be
touched and which is not normally live, but which can become live when
basic insulation fails.
Extraneous/non-electrical conductive part: conductive part not
forming part of the electrical installation and liable to introduce an
electric potential, generally the electric potential of a local earth.
The issue is with the name of the last definition. Is it clearer
to call it an 'Extraneous conductive part' or call it a 'Non-electrical
conductive part'? Why do you prefer one name over the other?
Keep those cards and letters coming, folks... we'll tally the
votes and let you know how it comes out...
:>) br, Pete Perkins
- - - - -
Peter E Perkins
Principal Product Safety Consultant
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
+1/503/452-1201 phone/fax
[email protected] email
visit our website:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/peperkins
- - - - -
---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).
