On Wednesday, March 10, 1999 5:00 AM, WOODS, RICHARD 
[SMTP:[email protected]] wrote:
> As I think about this situation, there is a way of obtaining UL Listing 
on
> the rack and have other certification marks on the internal equipment. 
Have
> UL List just the rack without the equipment. Now you can mix and match 
the
> internal certified equipment as you see fit keeping in mind not to exceed
> the cooling and electrical capacity of the rack. This is what we use to 
do a
> decade ago at a mini-computer company. We would configure systems from
> Listed racks, cpus, disks, tapes, etc.
>
RRR. So after we obtained the UL listed for rack (model ABC-001), then we 
configure, add recognized disks, recognized tapes ...etc. etc.. now it 
become new model (DEF-001). Do we have to submit this new model for 
certification again ???.
>

 Now to Jim's point. There is no law that requires one agency to accept the
> certification marks of another agency. For example, UL will not accept 
ETL
> marks on components and both are NRTLS. The only way one agency will 
accept
> the marks of another is if there is an agreement between them. The CB 
scheme
> is one good example. CSA and UL have an agreement to accept each others 
test
> data I believe, but I don't believe that they will accept each others 
marks.

RRR. They don't accept each others mark, but would they review and accept 
test data???

Tac Pham
HC Power
>
>       ----------
>       From:  Jim Eichner [SMTP:[email protected]]
>       Sent:  Tuesday, March 09, 1999 3:23 PM
>       To:  'EMC-PSTC - forum'
>       Subject:  RE: Rack System Safety (UL1950/EN 60950) Questions
>
>       Re Richard's item 5)...
>
>       > 5.    UL requires that all internal equipment be UL Listed or
>       > Recognized.
>       >
>       If that is true, then the value of the CSA/NRTL mark, and conversely
> the
>       cUL mark if CSA plays this way too, is highly questionable.  Do you
> have
>       a direct-from-UL interpretation saying that they are not accepting
> the
>       CSA/NRTL mark?  If so, I would expect CSA to take action to defend
> its
>       mark, and UL to have no firm ground to stand on!
>
>       Comments?
>
>       Jim Eichner
>       Statpower Technologies Corporation
>       [email protected]
>       http://www.statpower.com
>       Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend, who really
>       exists.  Honest.
>
>
>

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to