For those that don't know, Kemet the capacitor company has a very useful
downloadable capacitor impedance calculator available on their web page. Go
get it and try it,

http://www.kemet.com/kemet/web/homepage/kechome.nsf/vabypagename/spicesoft

Jim Allan
Manager, Engineering Services
Milgo Solutions LLC
1619 N Harrison Parkway
Sunrise, FL, 33323
E-mail [email protected]
Phone (954) 846-3720
Fax     (954) 846-5693

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 3:41 PM
> To:   [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject:      Re: Gnd grid
> 
> 
> Yasser,
> 
> The si-list archives at  http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu  have a lot of
> information on
>       this and
> 
> related subjects.  Here is a post that I made on power/ground gridding in
> April.
> 
> 
>                                               John Barnes  Advisory
> Engineer
> 
>                                               Lexmark International
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        >I'm relaying out a pcb for one of my customers. The goal is to
> reduce
>       the cost
>       >by going from 4-layer (internal PWR and GND planes) bd. down to
> 2-layers.
>       One
>       >of the major concerns is increased EMI.
>       >One of the ideas that was brought up to minimize EMI is to have a
> "grid"
>       of
>       >horizontal PWR traces spaced around 2cm from each other on top side
> and
>       >vertical GND traces spaced 2cm on the opposite side. In addition,
> the
>       board
>       >would have a GND ring around the perimeter on both sides that would
> be
>       stiched
>       >with vias. Every point of intersection of these PWR and GND lines
> will
>       have a
>       >.01uF and .1uF bypass cap.
>       >Since I haven't heard about this approach, your input would be
>       appreciated.
> 
> Ilya,
> You would do much better to tightly grid both power and ground, by
> putting:
> *  Horizontal PWR and GND traces topside, next to each other if possible.
> *  Vertical PWR and GND traces bottomside, ditto.
> *  Additional GND traces anywhere you can sneak them in, of whatever width
> will
> fit.
> *  Vias connecting the topside and bottomside PWR traces wherever they
> cross, as
> close as possible to the power
>    pins of the IC's and connectors.
> *  Vias connecting the topside and bottomside GND traces wherever they
> cross, as
> close as possible to the ground
>    pins of the IC's and connectors.
> 
> I also like to put a ground ring around the board on each layer, and tie
> these
> ground rings together with vias about every 1/2 inch (1.2cm), irregularly
> spaced.  This style of gridding will give you low inductance in both PWR
> and
> GND.  For any direction of current flow within a grid you have multiple
> paths,
> widely spaced so their mutual inductance is low.  Therefore the effective
> partial inductance between any two points is the partial inductance of any
> one
> path divided by the number of parallel paths between the points.  For
> power
> going out to a device, it can return by a parallel ground path which has
> high
> mutual inductance and therefore low overall loop inductance/impedance.
> You do
> lose much of the capacitance between power and ground planes that you
> would have
> on a multilayer board, but for a four-layer FR-4 board that amounts to
> only
> about 100pF/square inch (15 pf/square cm).
> 
> After gridding, an overall view of the board might look like (V=via,
> P=power
> trace, G=ground trace):
> 
> 
>  overall grids =           ground grid               + power grid
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> !VGGVGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGVGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> !GVPGPGVPPPGVPPPGVPPPVG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !VGGVGVGGVGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGVGVGGVGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GVPPPGVPGPGVPPPGVPPPVG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !GP   GP G GP   GP   PG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP G VGGGGVP   PG!  !G    G  G VGGGGV     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP G GP   GP   PG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !VGGGGVGGVGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGVGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GVPPPGVPPPGVPPPGVPPPVG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !GP   GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   VGGGGVP   GP   PG!  !G    VGGGGV    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GVPPPGVPPPGVPPPGVPPPVG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> 
> 
> 
>  topside traces =          ground traces             + power traces
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> !GVPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPVG!  !G                    G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> !GVPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPVG!  !G                    G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !G         VGGGGV     G!  !G         VGGGGV     G!  !
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> !GVPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPVG!  !G                    G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !G    VGGGGV          G!  !G    VGGGGV          G!  !
> !
> !G                    G!  !G                    G!  !
> !
> !GVPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPVG!  !G                    G!  ! VPPPPVPPPPVPPPPVPPPV
> !
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> 
> 
>  bottomside traces =       ground traces             + power traces
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> !VGGVGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGVGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> !GV G GV   GV   GV   VG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! V    V    V    V   V
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP G GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G  G G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !VP V VP V VP   VP   PV!  !V  V V  V V    V     V!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GV   GV G GV   GV   VG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! V    V    V    V   V
> !
> !GP   GP G GP   GP   PG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP G GP   GP   PG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP G GP   GP   PG!  !G    G  G G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !VP   VP V VP   VP   PV!  !V    V  V V    V     V!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GV   GV   GV   GV   VG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! V    V    V    V   V
> !
> !GP   GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GP   GP   GP   GP   PG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! P    P    P    P   P
> !
> !GV   GV   GV   GV   VG!  !G    G    G    G     G!  ! V    V    V    V   V
> !
> !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !VGGGGVGGGGVGGGGVGGGGGV!  !
> !
> +----------------------+  +----------------------+
> +----------------------+
> 
> 
> Try to have 2-to-4 traces going to each power/ground pin on the board.  If
> you
> must use a single trace to connect an IC/connector/capacitor pin to the
> appropriate grid, make it short and fat-- less than a 3:1 or 5:1
> length-to-width
> ratio,
> and try to terminate the other end in a via to take advantage of the
> horizontal
> and vertical current paths.  You will almost always be better off having
> the
> power/ground traces squirming across the board, going directly between
> IC/connector/capacitor pins, than having the power/ground traces straight
> with
> stubs coming off them.
> 
> Put the bypass capacitors for an IC as close as possible to its power
> pins, with
> the other end connected to a ground trace that goes as directly as
> possible to
> the associated ground pin(s).   If an IC has a phase-locked loop (PLL),
> for
> example, it will almost always have a Vccpll and a GNDpll pin associated
> with
> it.  Put the bypass capacitor(s) for the PLL across these pins, and the
> bypass
> capacitors for the regular Vcc and GND pins between those pins.  This
> placement
> takes advantage of the more extensive gridding, and therefore lower
> inductance/impedance that we usually achieve on ground versus power.  I
> like to
> have a bypass capacitor for each power pin, or closely grouped set of
> power
> pins, on an IC.  If power pins are next to each other, or separated by
> only one
> other pin, I let them share a bypass capacitor.  Otherwise each power pin
> gets
> its own bypass capacitor.  If you put two bypass capacitors on a pin their
> values should be in a 100:1 ratio-- a 100nF capacitor paralleled by a 1nF
> capacitor, or a 10nF capacitor paralleled by a 100pF capacitor.    This
> keeps
> the impedance from skyrocketing at a frequency where the inductance of the
> large
> capacitor resonates with the capacitance of the small capacitor.  If you
> are
> using Surface Mount Technology (SMT)
> ceramic capacitors, their self-resonant frequency (SRF) is so high that
> you will
> probably need two bypass capacitors only for oscillators and PLL's.  See
> my post
> from last week, where I measured 80+ types/values of ceramic and tantalum
> capacitors on a Network/Spectrum Analyzer.   SMT capacitors have
> incredibly
> better high-frequency performance than pin-through-hole capacitors.
> 
> You will also probably need to put some bulk capacitors on the board.  At
> least
> one should be close to the power-entry point.  If the board is large, you
> will
> be wise to also put bulk capacitors:
> *  At the farthest point on the board from the power input.
> *  At the power pins of connectors for peripheral devices or adapter
> boards.
> *  Close to any components that are particular "power hogs".
> 
> We have used this style of gridding, with grids about 1/2" by 1/2" (1.2cm
> x
> 1.2cm), on network adapter cards with clock speeds up to 45MHz.  We do use
> Spread Spectrum Clock Generators (SSCG's) wherever we can, to meet
> FCC/CISPR
> Radiated Emissions limits on these two-sided cards.
> 
>                                          John Barnes  Advisory Engineer
>                                          Lexmark International
>                                          author of Electronic System
> Design:
>                                            Interference and Noise Control
> Techniques
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to