ENV 50204 is still listed in the Cenelec Catalogue 2000 Issue 2 so it's not withdrawn yet. The reason that this has not been done by Cenelec Technical Board yet is unknown to me.
regards, Ari Honkala > -----Original Message----- > From: EXT Gert Gremmen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 9:54 PM > To: Helge Knudsen; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Vedr.: ENV 50204 > > > > Hello Helge, Richard and Group, > > Any ENV is a temporary (pre) standard that immediately gets > withdrawn on the publication date of the replacement standard : > in this case the publication date of EN 61000-4-3. > > It's existence is justified by the immediate need for a > standard, where > no suitable document is available. > This of course is independent of the publication of any A1 documents ! > > Conclusion: ENV 50204 is not applicable anymore. > Regards, > > Gert Gremmen, (Ing) > > ce-test, qualified testing > > =============================================== > Web presence http://www.cetest.nl > CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm > /-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/ > =============================================== > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf > >>Of Helge Knudsen > >>Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:46 PM > >>To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >>Subject: Vedr.: ENV 50204 > >> > >> > >> > >>Hi Richard and Group, > >>IEC/EN 61000-4-3/A1 is dealing with "Radiated electromagnetic > >>field from digital radio telephones", but ENV 50204 is not > >>withdrawn yet. I beleive this will happen on dow for EN > >>61000-4-3/A1: 2001-05-01. > >>Regards > >>Helge Knudsen > >>EMC Engineer > >>Jyske EMC > >>Literbuen 16B > >>DK 2740 Skovlunde > >>Denmark > >> > >>>>> <[email protected]> 05-09-00 20:20 >>> > >> > >>The Generic Immunity standard, EN 50082-1 references ENV 50204 for a > >>radiated immunity test. The foreword of the ENV says it > will be withdrawn > >>once an IEC/CENELEC standard has been published. Has this > interim standard > >>been withdrawn and replaced by an EN 61000-4 series > standard? If so, which > >>one? > >> > >>Richard Woods > >> > >>------------------------------------------- > >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > >> > >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > >> [email protected] > >>with the single line: > >> unsubscribe emc-pstc > >> > >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: > >> Jim Bacher: [email protected] > >> Michael Garretson: [email protected] > >> > >>For policy questions, send mail to: > >> Richard Nute: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------- > >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > >> > >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > >> [email protected] > >>with the single line: > >> unsubscribe emc-pstc > >> > >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: > >> Jim Bacher: [email protected] > >> Michael Garretson: [email protected] > >> > >>For policy questions, send mail to: > >> Richard Nute: [email protected] > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]
