The FCC rules seem to say that only in the case of a transfer of control could you relinquish responsibility of equipment compliance. FCC CFR 2.909: "The following parties are responsible for the compliance of radio frequency equipment with the applicable standards: ------------- (b) In the case of equipment subject to authorization under the verification procedure, the manufacturer or, in the case of imported equipment, the importer." See also FCC CFR 2.953(c): "In the case of transfer of control of equipment... ... the new manufacturer or importer shall bear the responsibility of continued compliance of equipment." Bandele Jetstream Communications, Inc. [email protected]
-----Original Message----- From: John Juhasz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 12:58 PM To: 'Don Clayton'; [email protected] Subject: RE: FCC Verification Testing Legally yes . . . the question I ask is who's is going to be resposible for continued compliance? And get it in writing. John Juhasz Fiber Options Bohemia, NY -----Original Message----- From: Don Clayton [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 12:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: FCC Verification Testing Just a quick question: Company A sells a non-residential ITE device which has passed FCC class A and has outside test lab. test report. Company B wants to re-label company A's product and sell it to be operated and installed as described in A's manuals. Can Company B use A's report as proof of FCC compliance. Thanks in advance Don Clayton ESR Engineering ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: [email protected] Michael Garretson: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected]
