Exactly.
Scott Lacey
-----Original Message-----
From: Brumbaugh, David [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Ambient Cancellation Device for OATS
I would like to add that one must be careful when it comes to using
such a system. I apologize if this has been pointed out already, but it
can't be emphasized enough. When using a system like this, you take the risk
that the ambient environment will mask significant emissions from the EUT.
You may never see these emissions under such conditions, and it will bite
you later.
I am particularly concerned when I hear this being touted as a
panacea for testing in traditionally noisy environments, such as development
labs. Be careful folks.
My 2 cents.
DB
> ----------
> From: Price, Ed[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Reply To: Price, Ed
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: 'Doug'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Ambient Cancellation Device for OATS
>
>
> Doug:
>
> As I understand the process, there isn't actually cancellation AT
the OATS.
> They have a monitor antenna nearby, but relatively far from the
EUT on the
> OATS. A real EUT signal should fall off considerably by the time
it reaches
> the monitor antenna, but an ambient emission will be relatively
constant at
> the monitor and measurement antennas. All you have to do is sample
the
> ambient, invert it, and sum it with the measurement antenna
voltage. This
> should delete the ambient from the measurement data. (Easy to say!
All you
> need is enough computing power and sufficiently capable processing
> algorithms.)
>
> The "cancellation" takes place as a data operation within the
Cassper
> hardware (or it's controlling computer), and not as an energy
cancellation
> of the propagating fields actually on the OATS site.
>
> And yes, I would also like to know more about how Cassper manages
to do
> this. But, I also realize they can't give away their trade secrets
either.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
> Ed Price
> [email protected]
> Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
> Cubic Defense Systems
> San Diego, CA. USA
> 858-505-2780 (Voice)
> 858-505-1583 (Fax)
> Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
> Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
>
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Doug [SMTP:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 11:38 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Ambient Cancellation Device for OATS
> >
> >
> > Perhaps it's because I've never understood ...
> >
> > How exactly does one do ambient cancellation at an OATS?
> >
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
