I believe all ADSL and HDSL interfaces that use POTS wiring should meet the safety requirements of a TNV-3 circuit. At present, the FCC in Part 68 does not have any requirements for xDSL equipment. Regards, Wolf Josenhans [email protected] (Peter Merguerian) on 01/26/2000 02:15:11 AM Please respond to [email protected] (Peter Merguerian) Sent by: [email protected] (Peter Merguerian) To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] (Wolfgang Josenhans/MW/US/3Com) Subject: HDSL Dear All, I would like to investigate (to UL1950 Third Edition) a unit intended for N. America with an HDSL interface having max 260 Vdc between the lines and 130 V between each line and earth. The maximum current limitation is 75 mA. How is this interface treated? Since it does not meet the requirements for TNV-1, TNV-2, TNV-3, I believe it should be treated as a secondary hazardous circuit but also applying the requirements for Overvoltage and output current limiting requirements. Also, does any one know the status of HDSL with FCC? Peter Merguerian Managing Director Product Testing Division I.T.L. (Product Testing) Ltd. Hacharoshet 26, POB 211 Or Yehuda 60251, Israel Tel: 972-3-5339022 Fax: 972-3-5339019 e-mail: [email protected] website: http://www.itl.co.il --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected] with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], or [email protected] (the list administrators).
