Peter:

We make products used in among other environments, refineries.  Products for
this market are packaged in explosion proof housings.  It is my
understanding that the explosion proof housing along with the conduit
servicing is completely isolated from the atmosphere via substantial
gaskets, seals O rings etc.  Having said that, explosion proof housings have
ratings for different environments, I don't have the specs in front of me
but I do remember that acetylene and other gaseous environments had higher
ratings due to corrosive properties.  For the European market there are
also, Cenelec approved housings.  I myself will be looking into these soon
also.

Hope this helps.

Best Regards,

Bill Jacowleff
VDO Control Systems
Airpax Instruments
150 Knotter Drive
Cheshire, CT 06410
Phone: 203 271-6394
FAX:    203 271-6200
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 11:55 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Fwd:electronics used in refueling



forwarding for Peter.  

____________________Forward Header_____________________
Subject:    electronics used in refueling
Author: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:       01/05/00 2:40 PM


PSNet

    I'll throw this out for discussion...

    What are the requirements for electronics used in refueling operations
-- 
either gasoline or diesel.  Is this always a hazardous location?  What 
separation issues exist from other connected electronics also used there?  
What specific certifications are applicable -- both in North America and 
Europe?  

    Looking forward to your comments. 

:>)     br,     Pete

            Peter E Perkins, PE
            Principal Product Safety Consultant
            Tigard, ORe  97281-3427     USA
            +1/503/452-1201 fone/fax  
            [email protected]  email  

Received: from ruebert.ieee.org ([199.172.136.3]) by mail.monarch.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.13) id 0008F202; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:39:43 -0500
Received:  by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3)    id OAA19184
Received: from gemini.ieee.org  by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP

id
OAA19168; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:40:48 -0500 (EST)
From: [email protected]
Received: from csimo01.mx.cs.com (csimo01.mx.cs.com [152.163.225.74])
    by gemini.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06129
    for <[email protected]>; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:40:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [email protected]
    by csimo01.mx.cs.com (mail_out_v24.6.) id 7.dc.dc6f4f94 (4510)
     for <[email protected]>; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:40:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 14:40:42 EST
Subject: electronics used in refueling
To: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) sub 44
X-Resent-To: [email protected]
Precedence: bulk

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to