Dear Mr. Ritenour, Mr. John Woodgate, I do agree with your statement about the "humouristic replies" often generated by Mr. Woodgate. Although I respect his level of professionalism on the subject (safety, emc), and the appropriate (and fast) way Mr Woodgate replies to questions on this forum, i think any contributor has to realize himself that people on this forum come from all cultures and level of education and have a different perspective of this list, and the people behind it. Great care should be taken not to scare away other -possible new members- from asking simple beginners and even dumb questions. And one should respect the way other members replies, may be not as to the point as he likes. The intent of creating humour in writing often is misunderstood, and members may not appreciate the humoristic sides of topics in the genre "been there seen that" If any contributor forgets to specify the units to any property of material, a simple addition would help others in the list, reluctant to ask, at the right information. I realize that his way of writing is not meant to offend anyone(not this time). Even if the contributor knows the one he replies to, and is sure about him to understand the intent, others do not and may conclude erroneously that the reply is offensive. His remarks about the way other newsgroups 'flame' contibutors, is in no way any reference to this specific list and their members. I think John, that even if you think that Mr. Taylor does not merit an apology, Mr Ritenour does !
Regards, Gert Gremmen, (Ing) ce-test, qualified testing =============================================== Web presence http://www.cetest.nl CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm /-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/ =============================================== >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] >>[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected] >>Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 1:20 AM >>To: [email protected]; [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Mr Woodgate's response to Mr Taylor wrt test table >> >> >> >>Dear Mr. Woodgate, >> >>This is a sincere inquiry. >> >>Until now I have been very impressed with the good manners shown >>by all the >>respondents on this site. Even the most naive questions (and responses) >>receive polite answers, or at worst are ignored. However, the >>tone of your >>response to Mr. Taylor seems to heap ridicule on his statements and by >>implication on Mr. Taylor. >> >>I am fairly new on the emc-pstc site, and until now felt safe in >>asking the >>few questions I have submitted. By safe I mean I have not feared >>that I would >>be "flamed" as if I were an ignoramus or poser asking questions of my >>betters. Now I am not so sure about how safe I really am. Is this >>your intent? >> >> Shouldn't you apologize to Mr. Taylor (and to the site) and >>clear the air? >> >>Sincerely, >> >>Thurman J. (Bill) Ritenour >>EMC Compliance LLC >>4575 Sioux Drive #303 >>Boulder, CO 80303 >>303-543-7404 >>[email protected] >> >>------------------------------------------- >>This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety >>Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. >> >>Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ >> >>To cancel your subscription, send mail to: >> [email protected] >>with the single line: >> unsubscribe emc-pstc >> >>For help, send mail to the list administrators: >> Michael Garretson: [email protected] >> Dave Heald [email protected] >> >>For policy questions, send mail to: >> Richard Nute: [email protected] >> Jim Bacher: [email protected] >> >>All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: >> No longer online until our new server is brought online and >>the old messages are imported into the new server. >> >>
<<attachment: Gert Gremmen.vcf>>
