<EDFA411E5E4AD2118D6F00A0C99E4BAC0386AF2E@FLBOCEXU02>, [email protected] inimitably wrote: >No, if the equipment was "placed on the market" prior to 2001 and was >compliant with the requirements in place at that time. Refurbished equipment >may be resold forever based upon the CE requirements at the time is was >placed on the market.
True if you restore it to its original condition. If, however, you 'improve' it in any way, or substitute new parts for unobtainable parts, then you need to document what you have done, with an explanation of why that hasn't altered the EMC characteristics of the product, which therefore does not need to be re-assessed. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
