<[email protected]>, Biggs, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, NA) <[email protected]> inimitably wrote: >In 1999, pR EN 50021 went to EN 50021. My question is...why have the >spacings for Pollution degree 2 been changed between the preliminary version >to the adopted version of 50021. The spacing requirements seem to have >increased.
A prEN is an unapproved draft. The subject was still under active discussion in IEC TC28 and IEC TC64 at the time, and the thinking changed between the prEN and the EN. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
