Michael,
        Thanks for the response. I am familiar with many of the European 
requirements for Hazardous Areas and am also aware of the US Division and Zone 
classifications (NEC 500 & 505?). However we have not come across NEMA 7 
before. Now that I know it is genuine, I can dig deeper.

Do you know whether NEMA 250 (??) is available to download or is it purchased 
through the usual suppliers. I couldn't find a NEMA site when I was looking 
earlier.
Best regards, Andy.

PS an apology to everyone for the "snotty nosed" warning about confidentiality 
attached to the end of my messages. They are added automatically by our IT 
dept. 

> ----------
> From:         Michael Taylor[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent:         25 April 2001 16:20
> To:   Andrew Wood
> Cc:   'emc-pstc'
> Subject:      RE: Request for help RE:   NEMA 7 
> 
> An enclosure rated NEMA-7 is intended for use in Explosive atmospheres (read 
> - big, heavy & VERY expensive).   You would need to know the Class, Division 
> & Group to select the correctly rated enclosure.
> 
> This (more or less) corresponds to the European EEx Zone, CAT. and Group 
> classification. See IEC-79-1A(part-1).   Also see: directive 94/9/EC and EN 
> 50014.   More information would be required to correctly determine enclosure 
> requirements.   Keep in mind that there will be other requirements placed on 
> your product for installation in a explosive atmosphere.
> 
> Regards, 
> Michael Taylor 
> Colorado 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Andrew Wood [ mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:46 AM 
> To: 'emc-pstc' 
> Subject: Request for help RE: NEMA 7 
> 
> 
> 
> Colleagues 
> I have been contacted by one of our sales engineers who has a request to 
> quote for supplying a product suitable for hazardous areas meeting NEMA 7 
> rating. He has already spent some time surfing the web.
> 
> My NEMA to IP rating conversion chart only lists NEMA 1, 2 3, 3R, 3S, 4, 4X, 
> 5, 6, 6P then jumps to 12,12k & 13. 
> 
> I have been unable to get any further myself on the web. It would be 
> appreciated if anybody could tell me whether NEMA 7 is probably an error in 
> the request, or is it a genuine but maybe little used rating that needs more 
> searching to track it down.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help. 
> Andy. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
This e-mail and its contents may be confidential, privileged and protected 
by law. Access is only authorised by the intended recipient. The contents 
of this e-mail may not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the 
intended recipient, or stored or copied in any medium. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately.



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


Reply via email to