<v04220802b6ed37956001@[192.168.1.13]>, Nick Williams <nick.williams@con formance.co.uk> inimitably wrote: >John, > >Can you give us an example of these 'special provisions'?
Obviously not in any detail, because they are not publicised and are decided on a case-by-case basis. > >I have often wondered how the formula 1 people go about complying >with the CE marking requirements. > They don't have to. Their kit is not 'in free circulation'. It goes to a specific location and is used there. Then it is all taken away to the next venue. It couldn't, for example, be put on sale instead of being taken away. Checks are made that none of it will interfere with other services. I suspect that there is no check on immunity, but the F1 people may do their own checks on what emissions are present in the area. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
