RS105 is the HAEMP requirement.  It is 50 kV/m double-exponential type 
waveform generated with a parallel plate.  This is obviously an unclassified
requirement.  There is a somewhat subtle change between D and E.  D shows
the peak at less than or equal to 10 ns.  E shows the peak at 5 ns.  Other
than that, the waveforms appear equivalent.

Ken Javor

----------
>From: Darrell Locke <[email protected]>
>To: "'EMC-PSTC - forum' (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
>Subject: MIL-STD-461E
>Date: Thu, Jan 25, 2001, 10:51 AM
>

>
> Dear Members,
>
> I have received the new revision of MIL-STD-461 revision E.  It contains
> much more detail on testing to the existing requirements.  I have also been
> told by another source that it contains unclassified sections for HAEMP
> testing and parameters.  However, I do not see any reference to HAEMP in the
> E revision.  Can any of you military experts help me out here.
>
> 1.  What are the differences between 461D and 461E?
>
> 2.  Are there HAEMP requirements buried in the E revisions somewhere?
>
> Thanks
>
> Darrell Locke
> Advanced Input Devices
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
>      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>
> 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to