Mil-Std-461E has several Test Methods related to EMP.
Test Methods CS115 & CS116 attempt to evaluate the response of cabling to an
EMP.
Test Method RS105 directly creates a "mini EMP" by placing the EUT within a
parallel plate transmission line and whacking the EUT with a 2nS risetime,
50kV/M pulse. (Caution; don't try this at home!)
{Don't overlook the Appendix A, which provides further insight and rationale
for the official requirements.)
Ed
Ed Price
[email protected]
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA. USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
-----Original Message-----
From: Brumbaugh, David [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: 'Darrell Locke'; 'emc-pstc'
Subject: RE: MIL-STD-461E
The only difference that I am aware of is that MIL-STD-461E merges -461D and
462D into one document (list members, please correct me on this if I am in
error.)
If you are looking for HEMP, you can refer to MIL-STD-464. It has
unclassified requirements, but not test methods.
DB
> ----------
> From: Darrell Locke[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Reply To: Darrell Locke
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: 'EMC-PSTC - forum' (E-mail)
> Subject: MIL-STD-461E
>
>
> Dear Members,
>
> I have received the new revision of MIL-STD-461 revision E. It contains
> much more detail on testing to the existing requirements. I have also
been
> told by another source that it contains unclassified sections for HAEMP
> testing and parameters. However, I do not see any reference to HAEMP in
the
> E revision. Can any of you military experts help me out here.
>
> 1. What are the differences between 461D and 461E?
>
> 2. Are there HAEMP requirements buried in the E revisions somewhere?
>
> Thanks
>
> Darrell Locke
> Advanced Input Devices
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Jim Bacher: [email protected]
> Michael Garretson: [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: [email protected]
>
>
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
