As I understand it, a truly redundant power supply system means that only one
supply is connected and working at a given time.   In this case you can measure
the leakage current from only one supply.

Our system uses two power supplies that share the load, if one dies, the other
can maintain the full load.  In this case the leakage current is measured with
both supplies connected.

I think the way to approach this is, what happens if there is no protective
earth?  In test 5.2.3 and 5.2.4, there is no permanent earth connection to the
EUT.  Any current leaking to the chassis can be shunted to ground through
someone touching it.  This current must be less than 3.5 mA.

My CSA rep accepts the permanent ground connection, but management does not like
the warning.  We are also working with the manufacturer to reduce the leakage
current on each supply.

Best regards,

David.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Pickard" <[email protected]>
To: "Gary McInturff" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Looking at leakage current specs




Gary,

>If this equipment has a chassis bonding connection like you find in
>telephone line up equipment, would then it fall under the class B pluggable.
>I can still remove power cords, but have a chassis to frame bonding wire in
>parallel to that. (Yes, I know most of that stuff is DC but there is a small
>number that is not). I hope to work with the power supply folks to reduce
>the problem through filter design if I can, but I think this is an
>interesting questions. What do you think?

Pluggable Type B is a term which only refers to an industrial type power plug.

Having a permanently connected earthing connection may provide the relief from
the excessive leakage
currents you're experiencing. Such a connection might be described in 6.3.3.2,
6.3.4.1 and 6.3.4.3.2
(yeah I know, these are telco references), but, they adequately describe the
earthing conditions and
requirements. As an aside (well, sort of) I could never understand why such a
protective earthing
connection is described for the protection of a telecom circuit, and not
mentioned at all for the
protection (leakage current, etc.) of an AC mains circuit. Maybe someone more
knowledgeable than I
can explain that. At any rate, pass this by your friendly NRTL for their
interpretation of doing
this.

Also, an interesting paragraph exists in 5.2.2. It states "Equipment designed
for multiple
(redundant) power supplies shall be tested with only one supply connected." How
would one interpret
this? Only one supply connected and then the other, and then add the currents?
Again, maybe someone
more knowledgeable than I can explain this.

Just trying to stir the pot.

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
[email protected]



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]





-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to