Courtland,

The TCF (Technical Construction File) is a route that is unique to the EMC
Directive.  This route, as opposed to the Standards Route, is preferred when
there are no specific standards that apply to a product line or when there
are many variants of a product, proving it too costly to test each variant.
I recommend reading Chapter 8 of the Guidelines to the EMC Directive found
on the Web at :

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/electr_equipment/emc/guides/


Joseph C. Fries
AM Communications
Phone:  215-538-8748
Fax:  215-538-8779
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: Courtland Thomas [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 1:09 PM
To: emcpost
Subject: TCF's



Hello group,

I would like to know the intent of TCF's for CE. There are numerous
standards such as Radiated Emissions, Conducted Emissions, ESD, Radiated
Immunity, Fast Transients, Surge, etc..., that apply. What actually is the
intent of the TCF? Is it to allow the manufacturer to select only certain
standards in lieu of testing to all the standards?

Courtland Thomas
Patton Electronics



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to